OFFICIAL October 8, 2005 SAT I Forum

<p>no way fire truck is experimental. sorry</p>

<p>no it had to be a reading cause there were 4 of them</p>

<p>My last supporting paragraph (the one before my non-existent conclusion paragraph) pretty much sucked. I was 3 lines short of filling the two pages though. Hopefully the graders won't read through my entire essay and feel that I'm on track.. <em>crosses fingers</em></p>

<p>it's different for every person
for me it was math. but everyone had thef ire truck. so itw asn't that. i just hope it was one w/ the probability that n will meet the criteria 5n+3<or= 14, cuz i didn't see the "or= to" art, which ****ed me up huge... thats the only math i got wrong. LAME</p>

<p>they're required to read through the entire essay.</p>

<p>at least AP graders are</p>

<p>Did anyone else think the writing experimental was INSANE? At first I thought it was the actual writing section... I nearly had a heart attack, but thankfully posts here confirm that it wasn't. Jesus.</p>

<p>my conclusion in the essay was only 1 sentence, i had less that 10 seconds and 0.5 lines left to write w/</p>

<p>is that bad?</p>

<p>Anyone know about the math problem with the state universtiy and community college, where she took 35 credits at state or whatever?</p>

<p>all this talk about the right answers is really getting me depressed....is anyone feeling even worse? lol</p>

<p>maybe i shud stop reading this post</p>

<p>Sup Flipsta. On the one you said the answer was</p>

<p>(2x)^y)((2x)^2y - 1)))</p>

<p>Do you remember what answer choice that was? Also, could you explain how you got it if you at all remember the details of the problem.</p>

<p>is it possible that one of the reading comp is an experimental??</p>

<p>CAN SOMEONE PLEASE SAY WHICH WRITING SECTION WAS EXPERIMENTAL?? Was it the one with the paragraph improving section about Eggs, or skyscrapers?</p>

<p>georgeS, the qeustion was (2x^3y-2x^y), right? so you divite by 2x^y, and bring it out of the parenthasese, and that's how that answer came to be. </p>

<p>I had no writing questions about skyscrapers i don't think, or eggs.. so that WAS experimental. and yes, it's possible for ANY section type to be experimental for you. Mine was math.</p>

<p>Reykjavic then how is the answer </p>

<p>(2x)^y)((2x)^2y - 1)))</p>

<p>? Am I doing the math wrong?</p>

<p>Does anyone know what the real writing section's paragraph improvement passage was about?</p>

<p>110% positive it was bent...analyze; it was a bad sentence even with the correct answer, but the only one that worked</p>

<p>FOR OTHER CR CHOICES:</p>

<p>Simplistic
Completely agreed
Laying foundations
Appreciates political concern
Vain</p>

<p>DID ANYONE KNOW THE ONE ABOUT THE ACTING PASSAGE, WHERE IT WAS LIKE, "IT ASSUMES THAT ACTORS..." I put "have already experience all human emotions but i don't know...</p>

<p>eggs had to be experimental, i didnt have em</p>

<p>Btw was it "cajole" or "bully". I'll vouch one in for "cajole".</p>

<p>dude for the math problem, just use simple distribution - multiply the terms you have inside the brackets by the term you have on the outside, and you'll get what the question asked you to factor</p>

<p>appreciates political concern? what specific question was that and what other choices</p>