<p>It was definitely bully . . . cajole is close, but doesn't work.</p>
<p>okay for the logic question... where the choices were penchant/evading, bent/analyzing
wouldn't it make sense that if she had an inclination towards logic, she is likely to EVADE argumentative problems?
I agree, MLK VERY DIFFICULT/CONFUSING
Acting section not too bad.
Cecil wasn't as terrible either,
those were the non experimental ones
my experimental was crit reading about Nixon</p>
<p>Simplistic
Completely agreed
Laying foundations
Appreciates political concern? <- I don't remember what this was
Vain
bully</p>
<p>if she had a penchant for logic, why would she try and escape the discussion? i think you're looking too deep into it...</p>
<p>ca·jole
tr.v. ca·joled, ca·jol·ing, ca·joles</p>
<pre><code>To urge with gentle and repeated appeals, teasing, or flattery; wheedle.
</code></pre>
<p>The answer is definitely bully, since it talked about threatening.</p>
<p>also did anyone get nudge as one of the SC answers?</p>
<p>bully not nudge or cajole</p>
<p>No, it was not nudge . . . it was "bully"</p>
<p>well if she were logical, she wouldn't get into those kinds of problems/arguments... it makes sense to me</p>
<p>anyone get the cecil one about her quiet life but she played piano? I put something about her becoming passionate about life</p>
<p>Ok, someone answer my question . . . for the acting passage, do you remember when it asked, "this paragraph assumes that actors have..." i put "already experience all human emotions" but i want to know what others put</p>
<p>-have already experience all human emotions (yes i said taht too)
-simplistic
-cautious optimism
-laying foundations
-vain
-bully
-bent/analyzing
-honeychurch will become passionate about life</p>
<p>i put have experienced all human emotions. but i only remember that section vaguely; it was a hard one.</p>
<p>yeah, i put passionate about life as well</p>
<p>if she were logical, wouldnt she solve the problems to make the other people see where their logic was flawed?</p>
<p>and i dont see how it was laying a foundation. he suggested that the lawthing be used for spam, but would that really be considered laying a foundation? i put analyzing a problem or whatever.</p>
<p>the acting one was crap hard, did anyone get the prehistoric human CR passage? was it experimental?</p>
<p>PLEASE</p>
<p>The one with the community college and university and 35 and 3 or whatever. Anyone get 47? That one confused/stumped me for some reason.</p>
<p>Also, the one with -f(x) = f(-x) when...was the answer x^2+x? Or x^2+4? Anyone??</p>
<p>it's laying a foundation for political change because he says if that law about the phones was extended to cover spam on email the problem would be solved</p>
<p>i put laying a foundation, because he was describing an outline of a solution</p>
<p>I put completely agree but i too questioned it because it was too extreme. In the end, i chose it because it made more sense than optimistic...
There was nothing in the statement to be optimistic about--perhaps the fact that someone shares her point of view. But in that case, I thought that she would be in agreement anyway.</p>