Official October ACT Reading Thread

<p>what were the other choices for the boots/embellished one?</p>

<p>I put the mainland palm trees were less endangered, but I wasn’t sure about that one…What does everyone think?</p>

<p>the dancer admired the seagull’s dive right?</p>

<p>the dancer came out last because she had the most things to do?</p>

<p>man… i had to rush through the last passage… IT seemed really easy T_T ugh… i didnt guess well.</p>

<p>^charlotte, what was the correct letter to the mainland ecosystems one? i just blindly guessed because i had no time left. i put C. lol.</p>

<p>what was the main idea of the Harlem passage?</p>

<p>Yes, because it was endangered.</p>

<p>so it wasn’t the fact that the NPF paid less attention to the palm trees?</p>

<p>She met the president first right?</p>

<p>chair2 I put D I think. But I’m not sure if it’s right.
What was the answer to the mainland vs. island question?</p>

<p>were there any a’s on the last passage??</p>

<p>does the date on the painting represent when he began painting?</p>

<p>the date on the painting traced back or something to the day he was at the churcb</p>

<p>^I was looking for a choice like that but i couldn’t find it, it wasn’t a choice</p>

<p>nope, the date was an example of how carefully he did it. they said how the shadows changed, and you could tell when he painted what. shadows looked one way at 8 am, then another at 9 am…</p>

<p>did anyone get that ‘fixed’ most meant established?</p>

<p>also, the main idea was his attention to detail in painting, and not the influence of religion on painting?</p>

<p>yep, it was a choice. i remember seeing the words ‘traced back’ so i immediately picked it. anyone agree? like i said earlier, i might have been high XD</p>

<p>fixed= established yes</p>

<p>i think she got the parka fist because she couldnt have danced in front of the president wo it</p>

<p>Why isn’t the sentence added in the passage about the dutch painter? </p>

<p>and here’s the link to the passage, if anyone wants it… [Critic’s</a> Notebook | Sublime Architecture: Sacred Interiors Aglow; A 17th-Century Dutch Artist Gets His Due at a Getty Exhibition - The New York Times](<a href=“http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/26/arts/critic-s-notebook-sublime-architecture-sacred-interiors-aglow-17th-century-dutch.html?pagewanted=2]Critic’s”>http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/26/arts/critic-s-notebook-sublime-architecture-sacred-interiors-aglow-17th-century-dutch.html?pagewanted=2)
I accidentally posted in the english section earlier.</p>

<p>i picked the choice where it could be traced back to the day he started his painting</p>

<p>the second choice was that it traced back to the day he finished his painting</p>

<p>i didn’t think the last two were correct</p>

<p>she got the parka first, and the passage mentioned nothing about the size of the house</p>