<p>slope = 0
10char</p>
<p>how does amount of exposure relate to the concentration?</p>
<p>increasing it should reduce concentration.</p>
<p>The o3 breaks it apart.</p>
<p>@phlp</p>
<p>Was that a question?
And what experiment was this again?</p>
<p>Crap! Thanks. And I agree w/questionmark. Increasing it should reduce concentration. Are you talking about the experiement with the colors? (Green, Blue, and Yellow)</p>
<p>The question about would sphere A repel or attract, i put repel i think but i dont really remember. What do you guys think?</p>
<p>Wait was there even a question about O3?</p>
<p>It was attract. The two rods were opposite charges</p>
<p>Thequestionmark: It seems we’re talking about two questions here:</p>
<p>1) The years question, which asked for the year where the percentage of moderate damage was 8 plots. If you looked at the introduction, then you would have noticed that the total numbers for each graph for each year was 1000 plots. Thus, we can determine:</p>
<p>80/1000 = 8/100 = 8% Therefore, we have to look at the pie that has 8 % for moderate damage. That one was 1981/1991 I don’t remember. But it had the mod damage of 8 %.</p>
<p>2.) The average percentage of damage was light, due to the fact of the list decreasing in AVERAGE percentage. Posted earlier:</p>
<p>"they gave you the trees, quest. remember? and the key for damage was</p>
<p>light was equal to/below 30 %.
moderate was 31-59 %
high was above or equal to 60%</p>
<p>if you looked at the table, they were listed in decreasing percentages. most of them had below 30% so I put light. "</p>
<p>The answer cannot be “cannot be determined” due to this, I think. But I may be wrong.</p>
<p>can someone compile a list of what we made a consensus on? were just repeating the same q’s fom earlier</p>
<p>lol I know rawk, its’ annoying. people, PLEASE read the pages before typing your question. it’s a pain trying to re- explain the answers and determining what the answer is when we already did it two pages ago. Thank you. :D</p>
<p>The Potential Energy is magnetic. There is no energy stored in the wire.</p>
<p>well if you look at the diagram, pulling the bulb thing farther away would twist the wire, thats potential mechanical energy and it seemed to fit the question</p>
<p>What’s the consensus on the serpentine question</p>
<p>Erosion, Wuthering, or Metamorphasis</p>
<p>and the conensus on why the 60 frogs were marked up?</p>
<p>I picked C but i ran out of time and just guessed</p>
<p>the frogs were marked so that he could record each frog once or something like that</p>
<p>@marcr</p>
<p>was the letter choice A/F?</p>
<p>and yes Metamorphasis
is the answer</p>
<p>i was kind of rushed for time on the frog passage. i did the others just fine [i hope]</p>
<p>the study used female frogs with unfertilized eggs</p>
<p>did the frogs start from 0.8 m from each speaker?</p>
<p>what percent of frogs would move if you started at the mean. i guessed 2%, but i couldn’t read the passage</p>
<p>^it was .9 m I think, and I don’t remember the percentage…22 perhaps?</p>
<p>" the frogs were marked so that he could record each frog once or something like that "</p>
<p>This question was VERY annoying. It specifically asked though WHAT was he trying to AVOID… and the answer was C or D it said to avoid marking the same frog more than once but I wasn’t sure on the reason why I believe…</p>
<p>wait vince do you remember getting that answer in the procedures or did you look at something else?</p>