<p>^nope, he was just analogizing^</p>
<p>So I take it from all these responses: No one even considered “The answer cannot be determined”? </p>
<p>Because you do need to know how many trees ><</p>
<p>did someone get the gray scurvy tree? like 5(10)= 50
ugh i compeltely forget but it was something like that</p>
<p>Did anyone get “J” for the one that gave you 2- iodineaceticacid (or something like that) </p>
<p>What was the answer to the question where they drew out the acid and asked what it was?</p>
<p>Did it start with BrH, or start with HC?</p>
<p>60 males marked so you wouldn’t count the same one multiple times and skew it toward the frequency of that male.</p>
<p>for the chemistry one, did x = I ??
and i put down “answer cannot be determined” for trees. i think it’s wrong though</p>
<p>X = I for sure.</p>
<p>yes x = I</p>
<p>and the 2- iodineaceticoic (i think) acid
H 0=
I C C 0 - OH
H</p>
<p>and it was
BrCH2CH3COOH (i think)</p>
<p>what was the question for the answer “22%”? Someone said it had something to do with frogs</p>
<p>in the frog one, was the scientists hypothesis right? i said yes</p>
<p>^I put it was right</p>
<p>In the last section there was some sort of question about what X would be in a certain structure and I think two of the choices were O and Br, does anyone know what the right answer was to that question?</p>
<p>^ I was the answer.</p>
<p>About the average tree question thing…Didn’t it just asked what the damage was for trees in 1981? That’s the only reason I got “light”- otherwise I would have put “cannot be determined.” In 1981, 47% was light and moderate and high were both in the 20’s</p>
<p>why do they make it so hard to get a high science score… i mean the scale is usually</p>
<p>Science (40 questions
36 = 0
35 = 0
34 = -1
33 = -1
32 = -2
31 = -2
30 = -3
29 = -4
28 = -5
27 = -6
26 = -7</p>
<p>Reading is (40 questions)</p>
<p>36 = 0 to -2
35 = -3
34 = -4
33 = -5
32 = -6
31 = -6
30 = -7
29 = -8
28 = -9/- 10
27 = -11
26 = -12</p>
<p>What the question where the answer is 22% relating to frogs, I completely forgot</p>
<p>@tbonus: I was wondering the same thing…it’s curious that the curve is so bad when I really don’t hear of that many 36 science scores…but doesn’t science have like the highest national average? It’s like at 21 and english is at 20 or something like that…at least that’s what I heard</p>
<p>i got a 33 in english and like a 26 in science… and i have had my highest grades (in school) in science. Bio, Chem H, Physics H, Chem AP… I got an A in all those classes… I want to major in Chem. Eng so like a bad science score is not what I want</p>
<p>^ Well it’s not like the science section actually tests your science knowledge…just your reasoning ability</p>
<p>Can anyone answer my previous question-</p>
<p>About the average tree question thing…Didn’t it just asked what the damage was for trees in 1981? That’s the only reason I got “light”- otherwise I would have put “cannot be determined.” In 1981, 47% was light and moderate and high were both in the 20’s</p>
<p>cannot be determined</p>
<p>@tbonus - that’s the answer?</p>