<p>soo u mean some parts is incorrect rite?</p>
<p>SC
1. demeaning
2. conciliatory
3. abrasque
4. precarious
5. pretext
6. deleterious</p>
<p>Short Passage
1. evidence is unsubstantiated
2. ferocious
3. completely unfounded</p>
<p>Long Passage
1. effective use of language(Zora Neale Huston)
2. Arabic Numeral 3
3. vital=fundamental</p>
<p>man...... got that wrong, what about the anticipated one....can 'tremember too much</p>
<p>what was the pretext question?</p>
<p>What did you guys put for both authors main point is.. its like the first question in the double passage. What about the sentence completions about the scientists claim about babies..</p>
<p>Question: what's wrong with 'had begun' in the grizzly bear sentence? Isn't that just the past perfect form of begin? I wasn't sure if it had to be a different form of the verb, but I think 'had begun' is pretty valid in that context. An explanation would be greatly appreciated!</p>
<p>pinstriped, "had begun" should be correct, I think; I chose no error.</p>
<p>Thanks - I chose no error as well, but I was torn for a while. :)</p>