<p>i got what you got @Chrysanthemum14 </p>
<p>did not put hypothesis. cant remember what i put though… do you remember the other answer choices?</p>
<p>What was the answer to the circle and square with the shaded region? I got pi-2 because it was radical 2 over 2 squared - 1 or the area of the square. Which is 1/2 pi -1 or pi -2.</p>
<p>@Chrysanthemum14 yes im pretty sure that was it, and BC always had to be bigger than AC because the question said c=50 and a>b</p>
<p>Also, Im pretty sure that other answer was contrast, not figurative language.</p>
<p>@robbie12345 (π-2)/π</p>
<p>no, I wasn’t sure on hypothesis. Did you your put her friend was indignant? </p>
<p>Guys I noticed that the questions on the PSAT were also from the Nov 2011 SAT
Tale a look: <a href=“Nov SAT Tectonic Plates, Elaine Version!!!! - #76 by Siddysidsid - Test Preparation - College Confidential Forums”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-act-tests-test-preparation/1237523-nov-sat-tectonic-plates-elaine-version-p6.html</a></p>
<p>The one that mentioned what the drawing of the girl meant - I think i put that they were getting married </p>
<p>@nmehta98
i clearly remember putting hypothesis.</p>
<p>@chrysanthemum14 I didn’t get any of those, I think. I really really messed up. I guess on like 7-8. I wish I had focused more. It’s difficult to engage in a topic you know little about and that you don’t enjoy.</p>
<p>Did anyone get the the last of the sentence corrections as no error, no error, (error in figs) respectively? I believe that’s what I had.</p>
<p>This was the only article in which I think I missed questions. Also, did you put the guy in passage 1 would respond with skepticism in the negative ad story.</p>
<p>how did you get that answer?</p>
<p>Guys I noticed that some of the questions were from the Nov 2011 SAT. Take a look: <a href=“Nov SAT Tectonic Plates, Elaine Version!!!! - #76 by Siddysidsid - Test Preparation - College Confidential Forums”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-act-tests-test-preparation/1237523-nov-sat-tectonic-plates-elaine-version-p6.html</a></p>
<p>yes for skepticism</p>
<p>Each of the paintings has or have? </p>
<p>See I also put jubilant for the Elaine passasge.</p>
<p>Which passage was the contrary vs fig language for?</p>
<p>Which passage was the hypothesis one? And the choices?</p>
<p>elaine i put exacerbate, hypothesis was on elaine i think</p>
<p>And what was the one with the radiuses and triangles?</p>
<p>Calvin12341 I put has</p>
<p>Yes to skepticism. It was the only one that made sense.</p>