<p>I'm about to CRY! I thought I did well, only omitted two and though I knew virtually every question, WHAT HAPPENED!?!?!?!?! I could've sworn that I got atleast a 780 with the curve.... T_T</p>
<p>Calculus - 590 (is EXTREMELY embarrassed; I did pretty well in the class, too, but not so well on the regents :::blames it on teacher::: lol)</p>
<pre><code> I honestly thought that I had 800's in both of the histories, for I am a through-and-through history junkie who spends a lot of his time simply looking through encyclopedias.
</code></pre>
<p>The online score report is not an official score report because of a couple of reasons. First, there is the issue of the score's veracity as it is sent to colleges and your high school (for record-keeping); secondly, the "official score report" doubles as a money-making process for the CB.</p>
<p>Yea, my friend got the highest in the school, 630 for Chemistry...and we're the smartest people in the school and we've done extremely well on every other standardized test (for the most part)...so yes, it is wierd. I didn't do so well on the Math IC...but let's not make me write that accursed grade lol.</p>
<p>yeah i hated chem it was hella hard and the curve is weird 89%=750
yep i got 750...not bad i supoes since my teacher didn't teach
i went to a prep class tho, teacher was genius. lol i admire him</p>
<p>Regarding the Global History, the questions were pretty specific, but they weren't difficult for the most part. As long as you're already pretty well-acquainted with the material and you read through the Kaplan book the week before, you should do quite well.</p>
<p>I am applying to transfer, and I got a 670 on Eco Bio, 700 in French reading, and an 800 on the Writing test (required). Now I'm starting to think these are *****ty scores...</p>
<p>I got an 800 in Math IIc and an 800 in Physics...the 800 in physics, though, was because I took AP Physics, and also because I prepped a lot on the stuff we didn't cover in my AP class (thermo, optics, etc.) I felt like I did horribly on the test on those things...it seemed to me that I skipped some questions...but apparently I did not do so bad.</p>
<p>I used Princeston SAT Physics to review for the physics, and I have something to say about the book: I think it is too difficult. Not that that is a bad thing. It's a great book, for learning physics. But I took one of the practice tests and I only finished half of it, and made in the low 700s, I think...albeit I may have been distracted...but still, that was such a large difference from how I did on the actual test! I thought it was interesting. I recommend the Princeston book for learning physics (I used them also for AP, they're really good), but I don't know so much about for the SAT test...</p>
<p>I did not really study for the SAT Math IIc, but I did get the SparkNotes book and take three practice tests. I recommend the SparkNotes test book. I did not want to bother studying the math, I do not like just reading math prep like that...but I liked the practice tests. Undoubtedly they helped. I felt like I should have studied more, but I suppose not...</p>
<p>800 on Math IIC - used Barron's/precalc course
790 on Biology M - use Sparknotes online/sparknotes flashcards/kaplan review/barron's tests/honors biology course</p>
<p>Math IIC - 800 - took right after AP Calc AB - skimmed sparknotes online
Physics - 800 - took right after AP Phys C - used sparknotes book for topics not covered in AP Phys C</p>