<p>Missouri Compromise: prohibit slavery north of 36 30 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_compromise%5B/url%5D">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_compromise</a> (I'm only on the 11th page of this thread and wanted to post before I forget what to say)</p>
<p>What did you guys get for the chart with the statistics of number of employees employed in the White House? Great Depression made employment decline?</p>
<p>Yea I got the GD made employment decline</p>
<p>im not sure...i think i put increased spending for kennedy/johnson in vietnam..i dont remember if that was the same question though</p>
<p>it would appear that way?? </p>
<p>i hope its a generous curve.</p>
<p>how many wrong for a 700 again?</p>
<p>for missouri said the 36,30 too</p>
<p>but the M. Compromise didn't eliminate slavery above the border forever... (ie: Kansas Nebraska Act)</p>
<p>yeah missouri was definitely 36 30</p>
<p>i said missouri compromise... temporary tension relief</p>
<p>i put vietnam too</p>
<p>yea it was most definitely a delay of conflict</p>
<p>well wat was the exact question?</p>
<p>state votes for war of 1812... most southern states were for the war?</p>
<p>it was delay of conflict. it can be 36 30 b/c missouri is above 36 30</p>
<p>it was a delay of conflict cuthe 36 30- thing didnt last</p>
<p>yeah southern states</p>
<p>i dont even remember it...all i remember is putting 36 30...however, it was declared unconstitutional in dred scott...IF dred scott came before the kansas nebraska act, then it would make sense</p>
<p>What about the farm/nonfarm chart?</p>
<p>Was it something like farmers didn't get as much, hence, the lower total avg?</p>
<p>Yea southern states were for the war</p>
<p>What was the Vietnam question ?</p>
<p>Yea i think it was Genesis, wasnt that the Q where it was like, what does the chart NOT show, and it didnt show anything about the farmers</p>