OFFICIAL SAT1 Thread

<p>this confusion is probably the price u pay for taking one of the final three before they changeover.. but i'm pretty sure the 1-para verbal was experimental cos I didn't get 2 quant comp. math sections..</p>

<p>If Your Test Looks Different Then Mine Please List Order Of Sections</p>

<p>Yeah, I had what rxb had.</p>

<p>what did you put for the hiking one. The last quesion was what was the tone of the two passages. I put the first was arguementative and the second objective. Not exactly sure if that is what I put but I remember thinking about it</p>

<p>same as KMS.</p>

<p>And by no means was it arumentative...objective. If I had to guess it was humorous...earnest; even though I didn't put that.</p>

<p>I didnt put moratorium...what were the other choices?</p>

<p>I put earnest as well.</p>

<p>3d shape...I got 4 I think. I dont think I got that one right, heh.</p>

<p>zeus if your test is different list sections! if not then obviously you didnt have two QCs</p>

<p>it was moratorium. A moratorium is a break.</p>

<p>yup so the quant comp. was experimental</p>

<p>I had a COMPLETELY different test, mine went like this:</p>

<p>Maths - 25 multiple choice
Verbal - 35 Q with short passages (experimental?)
Verbal -35 Q normal
Verbal - 30 Q
Maths - quantitative comp + grid-ins
Verbal - 13 Q
Maths - 10 Q</p>

<p>Did anyone get the passage about the Eastern immigrant? For the second to last question, was it B) value hardwork more than material possessions or D) adjusted their desire to reality? I put D...since it never said that their parents weren't concerned with material possessions but more like that that their parents were satisfied with what they have when considering their past.</p>

<p>Hi,</p>

<p>If You Had Two Qc Sections...did You Have Short Reading Comp Section? Please List So I Can Move On With My Life!!!</p>

<p>rxb, just listing the sections isn't going to figure out which was experimental. You need to list the questions in the sections as well. It is possible for two people to have section 3 be verbal, but one person has passage x and the other person has passage y. In the past, that's how it's been determined which sections were experimental. If not everyone had a certain question, it was part of the experimental section. So far, everyone has had the short passages, so that doesn't look like the experimental. However, not everyone has had two QCs, so one of them must be experimental.</p>

<p>It was not moratorium. The answer was stopgap. Because stopgap means transitional.</p>

<p>yes I had two QC sections and the short reading passage my format went like this:</p>

<p>math
verbal
math quant comp.
math quant comp.
verbal short passages
verbal double passage
math</p>

<p>yes, but i just want to know if short passages were exper. regardless of content. if both tests have them, they are, correct?</p>

<p>Hell yes! I had stopgap.</p>

<p>Did everyone have a passage about jewelry.</p>

<p>If you had 2 quant comp. sections, tell me if you had a passage about jewelry.
And the platitude: originality analogy!</p>

<p>yes it was stopgap good call moratorium was a long break like very long so it wouldn't fit. So that was my first wrong answer oh well.</p>

<p>Dunkaroo, was that double passage 35 questions?</p>

<p>So, those of you with only ONE QC section, did you have a question that had to do with the average GPA at some college? Or a question pertaining to a line segment AB with midpoint M?</p>