<p>
Current student here. I’m pretty sure this is not how it works. All applications are read by at least one person, if I recall every decision has to be approved by the Dean of Admissions. Basically, that initial reviewer will read your application and assign numerical rankings to various categories (essay, ECs, academic, HS quality, test scores, and then check off boxes like legacy, URM, what-not). The applications are then ranked, some students are admitted, and a lot of people cut off at this stage.</p>
<p>If I recall this is where the second reader comes in, to repeat the ranking process. More admit/reject decisions are probably made, and some deferrals happen. </p>
<p>If there is disagreement, or if a case is borderline, then it goes to the committee. This is the image you probably had in mind, with everyone at a table, some heated arguments, and more. Your regional officer is your advocate in this process, so give them a reason to pull for you. I think this is a couple hundred applications at most. </p>
<p>At least that’s how it was told to me by an insider. It also seems to make more sense- 30,000 some applicants times 10 minutes reading application and discussing adds to (if all officers read every application) 300,000 minutes, which equals 500 hours, which equals about 65 days of work, which is 13 weeks or 3 months. Seeing as decisions come out at the end of March (3 months), that would be a super tight time frame. </p>
<p>Also the point of a regional admissions officer is that he or she will have a high degree of familiarity with the towns, high schools, and opportunities available in that area. If every officer read every app, the regional officer would in effect be the one deciding anyway, due to that information gap.</p>