<p>Thedude, Zero is not a negative integer :(.</p>
<p>0 is not odd or even.</p>
<p>thedude, i got 125, I'm pretty sure it was right</p>
<p>you can't use 101, zero isn't a positive odd integer.</p>
<p>0 is not an odd integer, so I think it is 125. I could be wrong though.</p>
<p>wait -- what was the question to thing that i said was = to zero?</p>
<p>Pretty sure the cone problem was expiremental cause that section was pretty odd(herioglyphic problem wtf) and had some mathmatical symbol similar to a J that I am not familar with.</p>
<p>Basically it was just there are 5 odd integers so 5 for the first digit X 5 for the second digit X 5 for the third digit = 125.</p>
<p>I know this one was experimental but I'm just wondering what did other people get for the area of the square inside the square?</p>
<p>yea.. was the one with roman mathmatics experimental?</p>
<p>I didn't have the hyroglyphic one so it musta been experimental. I still can't figure out for the life of me which one I did have that was experimental.</p>
<p>any guesses on what the curves will be then?</p>
<p>Guys, I assure you that admonish: reproof is extol: virtue</p>
<p>wait what was the question whos answer was 1/2?</p>
<p>God Damn it! Youre right about the odd integer problem.</p>
<p>Guys, I assure you that admonish: reproof is extol: virtue</p>
<p>that sounds 100% correct. but i dont think it was asked liek that</p>
<p>i'm pretty sure honor : accolade. to admonish someone is to rebuke them...a reproof is a rebuke in itself.</p>
<p>aviacaspirit, </p>
<p>What do you mean?</p>
<p>It was definitely "mouth:harbor"</p>
<p>I think extol:virtue was for another question (not positive).</p>
<p>And the 1/2 one, Richard, was where on one side it had X and the other side X^2 (with some numbers in front) and then you had to say any number that would make the X side greater than the X^2 side. Didn't have to be 1/2.</p>
<p>Admonishment comes in the form of reproof and praise comes in the form of an accolade. I sure of this one.</p>