<p>I'm 99% sure the answer is 61, 63 because you are trying to prove that after the first prime number, the next one is NOT prime. 43 and 53 are both prime, so the answer is 9x7= 63.</p>
<p>I agree with joker, I think it said which made it true. but if it was disprove then it would be 61,63.</p>
<p>also number 3 on grid in is i believe 9</p>
<p>yea 61,63 is right</p>
<p>CAN WE GET A CONFIRMATION</p>
<p>WAS the sequence with 620 terms question exerimental????//</p>
<p>no it wasn't collegefreak87 i've answered this multiple times</p>
<p>rhcpi95rock, the question was (2x+3x)> (2x)(3x), for which value can this statement be true?</p>
<p>No Experimental Was Not The One With 620</p>
<p>yea that one</p>
<p>it wasn't experimental, i had that one too.</p>
<p>Joke, I stated what the question was above.</p>
<p>41 is prime. 43 is also prime. There was another answer that also had two prime numbers.</p>
<p>61/63 was the only one that had a prime number followed by a non-prime number. I am 100% sure.</p>
<p>so how many has everyone missed so far me->2</p>
<p>yea, i agree with poolio10</p>
<p>i only missed the train one on math. hopefully, i can get 800.</p>
<p>and 700 on verbal. 3 analogies, 1 sentence completion for sure. and NOTHING ELSE. hopefully, missed 3 or 4 on the 4 reading passages, which will give me at least 700.</p>
<p>i had a look at january 2002's test.. and both sections remind me of it... here is there curve:</p>
<p>verbal
800 800 800 800 800 780 760 750 730 720 710 700 690...</p>
<p>math
800 790 770 750 740 720 710 700 690</p>
<p>it's a hunch... but i bet it's close.</p>
<p>SIGH. i don't remember anymore questions.</p>
<p>poolio i know you stated the question above, but I think you stated it wrongly</p>
<p>41,43 are both prime, and yes, you are correct, so was another answer's sets but it asked you to prove the statement true for the LEAST set of numbers</p>
<p>this CR was much harder than jan 2k2, but jan 2k2 had harder SC/anal</p>
<p>It asked which one disproved the statement, and I'm 100% sure that it was 61,63, because it has a prime number (61), but the next odd number is not prime (63/7 = 9 which makes it not a prime number), as many others have stated.</p>