Official US December SAT I Thread

<p>I agree with all answers stated by starbury</p>

<p>i still dont think thats fully correct i'd dispute some of those answres but i cant even remember wut i put -_-</p>

<p>i got an 800 last may lol...i put 23n/17. although i didnt really try</p>

<p>dodger: no clue -.-</p>

<p>to admonish is to put down with reproofs...
to honor is to honor with accolades...
to extol is to praise with virtue... < - it would have to be 'to extol is to praise about virtue' or something along those lines. I think i picked honor::accolades, hopefully my reasoning holds out. </p>

<p>CR sucked butt.</p>

<p>The answers starbury put are the same as mine, and I felt that they were correct. So, move on por favor</p>

<p>is foundation:support an experimental?
if not what werre some alternative answers if you guyz remember any</p>

<p>honor: accolade goddamit
.\ /. !!</p>

<p>hey hey! i think CR was better than analogies =T</p>

<p>sill : window</p>

<p>the experimental section i got involved small passages about a scientist and the Voyager robot missions, and that's all i can remember lol</p>

<p>isnt it pane?</p>

<p>LegendofMax, what did you get for the question about the Greeks in the AI passage?</p>

<p>I agree with HypnosX. It was honor/accolade</p>

<p>i had all of those but 1 or 2... and i have not gottena single math prob wrong. woot.</p>

<p>nope, foundation wasn't experimental b/ I had it on my test and math was my experimental section</p>

<p>instead of conspirational, which isn't even a word (i think you guys mean conspiratorial), i put meandering and candid. I am sure that's right!!!</p>

<p>I was ****ed, the exp. analogies were so easy, so I tried to be conservative on the other ones...</p>

<p>err...what's the "beam of light" Dr.Zhivago again?</p>

<p>human perception??
T..T''''</p>

<p>i think the window:sill a wrong anwer to the building:portal question, but I'm not sure</p>