Official US December SAT I Thread

<p>
[quote]
does ne one remember the cirlcle graph, where you had to determine if n travel books were bought the formula>??? plaease post answers?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Nirav, I don't think my pencil one is wrong. If it is, it we will see lol
It shouldn't hurt too much, since that is 1 question I miss.
The other 2 I missed are grid-ins which don't take away points. I'm still expecting >750</p>

<p>And the formula for the book one is. 23n/17</p>

<p>what was the experimental for the math!!! was it the section with the POSSIBLE lengths for a triangle and the size of a tunnel for a train of 200m?</p>

<p>No that was not experimental. Experimental was weird egyptian symobls</p>

<p>1200 for the train question, what were the answers to the sentence completion</p>

<p>omg... my friends also saw 3,4,5 for one of the answer choices of the possible sides of a triangle. do you think ets messed up my test booklet?</p>

<p>i had
section 1: 25 M
section 2: verbal
section 3: QC
section 4: 25 m
section 5: verbal
.....
It was kinda strange section four. some of the questions were the same as october's experimental. the one where an isoceles triangle has atleast one side m and atleast another 3m. SOO... is this experimental?</p>

<p>OK SC list starting now:</p>

<p>The drug proved______, it killed cancer cells, but it also killed regular cells as well. </p>

<p>Something along these lines, the answer is deleterious. I got it wrong because I was trying to rush through the section and only read up to the comma and assumed it would be therapeutic.</p>

<p>also, so is .078 acceptable as the answer for the last gridin</p>

<p>dodgerblue, I got that one wrong too, but accroding to earlier posts and my friends, it was experimental</p>

<p>Yes, .078 is ok.</p>

<p>i remember turbulence, was distort and minutiate answers</p>

<p>.078 could not be answers: the question specified the answer had to be a fraction, not what part</p>

<p>I got distort and mitutiae</p>

<p>lyrical said it is ok, inneedofhelp said it is not ok? :S</p>

<p>pham,</p>

<p>And the formula for the book one is. 23n/17</p>

<p>how is it that?</p>

<p>n + 6 also work...</p>

<p>Unless when they say something has to be a specific way they really mean anyway you want, then I'm pretty sure it has to be a fraction.</p>

<p>anymore s.c?</p>

<p>amnesia i too am confused</p>

<p>that sucks ass... i missed that one i guess. i tried 100% and 200%...</p>

<p>so i missed like 3 or 4 now... :X</p>

<p>n is the number of the books that were 17% of the total. The percentages are independant of the total number of books. True n+6 would work if there were 100 books total, but it could be any number of total books. If thee were 200 books, it would be n+12, if 300, n+18. Only 23n/17 works for any number of n.</p>

<p>i missed 3 for math!!! so terrible 3 miss and 1 omit is how many points ?</p>