<p>fdr because how he supported them</p>
<p>Yeah, FDR.</p>
<p>What was evident before 1929?</p>
<p>Pretty sure thats what I put. If the white house one is 1960, and the women's rights one is Ida Tarbell, then I shouldn't have gotten many wrong unless I made stupid mistakes.</p>
<p>what were the choices again for that 1929 q</p>
<p>I only remember wage inflation because that was what I put. </p>
<p>But for the suffrage one here is an excerpt from wikipedia encyclopedia:</p>
<p>Tarbell's other books included Life of Abraham Lincoln (1900), The Business of Being a Woman (1912), The Ways of Women (1915), biographies of Elbert H. Gary (1925) and Owen D. Young (1932), The Nationalizing of Business, 1878-1898 (1936), and her autobiography, All in the Day's Work (1939).</p>
<p>To me that pretty much rules Ida out.</p>
<p>Damn....What was the one with the painting that was a mess? I said Jacksonian abstract. I'm not sure what it is, but it looked abstract to me.</p>
<p>There was one near the end on paintings too that I left blank</p>
<p>You are probobly right about Betty Friedan, I rushed and must not have read "In the late 19th, and early 20th century" or I would have picked Friedan for sure, because she was from the 1960's.</p>
<p>man i dont know if i did to good</p>
<p>Yeah, it was Jackson Pollack abstract expressionism. I thought my eyes were crossed when I first looked at it.</p>
<p>Another choice for the 1929 one was something about agrarian production.</p>
<p>what was the question for the 1929 one</p>
<p>What was the one where you had choose which leader in the 1960s and 70s was not correctly paired with the group they led?</p>
<p>mijehar, I agree with the inflation thing. Can we come to a consensus on the presidential thing? The fact that we all put 1960, and there are legit arguements for it, I think make it the answer.</p>
<p>I honestly didn't expect to do well at all. My goal was a 700, but after taking it, I think I got very very few wrong. I left 2 blank, got the Ida Tarbell one wrong, and probobly a few others, but overall, I was definitely happy. Too bad I can't say the same for Math IIC. It'd be nice to add some points from history onto that.</p>
<p>I can't remember the question.</p>
<p>mijehar it was the one about the naacp. web dubois created it but they had somebody else listed.</p>
<p>Browns, I agree there too. NAACP had some guy I never heard of listed, and all the others were right, so I chose that.</p>
<p>i hope there is a big curve for this test. i started studying from sparknotes 3 days before the test. i got a 790 on there practice test but i don't think i did as well on this test. then again, i thought i did horrible on the sparknotes one too.
so far i have left 4 blank, missed the questions about ida tarbell, slavery(13th amendment-stupid stupid mistake), massive retaliation, and i think the question you guys were talking about earlier for 1929. i think i put high unemployment-complete guess. agggggggggggggggggh</p>
<p>bumpppppppp</p>
<p>dodgerblue, I'm not sure if it is 1960 or not. The caption said, "The New Look: All right wing" which makes me think that it is saying that the president was conservative too. I hope it's 1960 though.</p>
<p>I think I left the one about the group leaders blank because it refered to the 60s and 70s and I thought Web Dubois was before that and there would subsequently have to have a new leader. However, your answer is correct because NAACP was paired with Eldridge Cleaver, the leader of the Black Panthers.</p>
<p>what do you guys think the curve is going to be</p>
<p>Browns, why are you worrying if you got a 790 on the practices and you only have a few wrong so far. I think you can leave 4 blank and still get like 4 or 5 wrong and get an 800, so don't worry. Anything over a 700 is good for US history, and anything over 750 is really good. I'll be happy with anything over 750.</p>
<p>I am starting to agree mijehar about it being the Reagan administration. I thought because the tall part of the whitehouse was to the left that it meant thats where the president was, but maybe I interpreted it wrong. I am sure I got 2 wrong and left 2 blank so far though.</p>