<p>Well, in the D3 world, there are no “Official” visits as a recruit can go to an unlimited number of visits and schools can invite as many recruits as they want. In the D1 world, both recruits and schools are capped per NCAA rules. Thus, the term “Official” visit really only has technical currency in the D1 world. That said, and linguistics aside, I understand your question.</p>
<p>Again, it all comes down to trust, at least in the NESCAC. Also again, unlike the Ivy League, recruits have no independent commitment from the admissions office. In the D3 world, all that recruits have, at bottom, includes what the “coach” tells the recruit about how much he/she wants him/her as a recruit and what the “coach” tells the recruit about what the admission office liaison told the “coach.” Obviously, it’s far better (than not) to have a coach tell you the admissions committee has “green-lighted” your application. But, again, this is “telephone tag” thrice-removed and requires a certain amount of trust. Stuff–sometimes important stuff–can get “lost in translation” along the way.</p>
<p>Also obvious is that coaches risk jeopardizing reputational harm should they get a rep for misleading, misrepresenting, etc. That said, every Dec (for early admission) and April (for regular admit) a handful of folks (some on this Board) get “surprised” (read: burned) and ill-will lingers. For my money, a recruit’s biggest leap of faith involves trying to assess with some level of precision just how badly a coach “wants” you. By definition it’s a fluid process for most recruits (except truly national-level talent) that evolves over time and as a coach’s “wish-list” evolves. Think musical chairs–except without the Likely Letter system, the recruits cannot even “hear the music.”</p>
<p>Bottom-line: Common sense and a willingness to assess your recruit with brutal honesty will take you a long way. The academic criteria (SAT & GPA) for most schools are well-understood and you must obviously know your D’s raw academic profile. Depending on the sport (“stop-watch”-- e.g., track, swim) versus “team” sports (e.g., soccer, field hockey), one’s ability to brutally assess how your D’s athletic talent “stacks-up” is, while difficult, not impossible. And the key point of reference is with respect to the universe of other plausible recruits in your D’s sport that the coach is actively recruiting (along with your D). From the coaches perspective, they have to cover their risk (and roster spots) as they do not know what recruits “truly” want to go to their school. I’ve heard of recruits telling multiple schools that each one is the recruit’s “first-choice.” Coaches go to this rodeo every year; for recruits it’s a one-shot experience.</p>
<p>Again, the Ivy League has found a better way through a limited number of Likely Letters, allocated by sport. Setting aside a kid who does something truly stupid, this is the only way to truly know whether your daughter has passed the admission committee “pre-read” and just how badly the coach wants the recruit. Without it, the D3 world necessarily invites more confusion and more risk.</p>