<p>Citan: Here's one: Let f(x,y) = 1/(y+x-.5). This function will be continuous over the entire xy domain, EXCEPT where y = .5 - x (i.e a line parallel to y = 1 - x). Note that this line goes through the tip of triangle but not the trapazoid. Hence, the volume of the tip is undefined and we get the wrong answer.</p>
<p>There are many others. Just find a function that fails anywhere in the tip, and you have shown that subtracting the tip from the triangle is unreliable.</p>
<p>Edit(for Citan): The reason this confusion is occuring is because you are messing with our system of writing integrals. I understand that your system of 'order of operations' is valid, but please use our convention of 'intg' or 'int' to mean the integral sign and write out the equations. It will save a lot of headaches.</p>
<p>Ok, to prevent all confusion,
here are the only 2 possible ways in which we can write the original problem:</p>
<p>intg[0 to 1]intg[1-y to 4-y] f(x,y) dxdy + intg[1 to 4]intg[0 to 4-y] f(x,y) dxdy
intg[0 to 1]intg[1-x to 4-x] f(x,y) dydx + intg[1 to 4]intg[0 to 4-x] f(x,y) dydx</p>
<p>Examples of incorrect notation:
intg[1-x to 4-x]intg[0 to 1] f(x,y) dxdy + intg[0 to 4-x]intg[1 to 4] f(x,y) dxdy
intg[1-y to 4-y]intg[0 to 1]f(x,y) dydx + intg[0 to 4-y]intg[1 to 4] f(x,y) dydx</p>
<p>Malishka31: For the first question, you must use a power series expansion of e^x^2. As you know, e^x = Sigma(from 0 to infinity) (x^n)/(n!), and so e^x^2 = Sigma(from 0 to infinity) (x^2n)/(n!). Simply integrate this and you have your answer.</p>
<p>For the second, I got the same x, y, z, and lambda you got, but I think your minimum is off(check your substitution). I got 1320/121. And having a positive lambda has nothing to do with the number of critical points you may find.</p>
<p>Q1) I don't know what you mean. The series expansion for e^x is pretty standard stuff, it's just a simple Maclaurin series. If you substitute x^2 into that equation, you end up with something you can integrate.</p>
<p>Q2) My bad. We got the same answer, yours is just simplified version of what I had.</p>
<p>And no, the method of lagrange multipliers can give you any number of solutions (since you are simply solving a system of equations).</p>
<p>i am a half math major, meaning i only need to know 1/2 the info.</p>
<p>i have a 98 in calc 3, how, i dont know... i swear i dont know anything.</p>
<p>i got an 85 on this last exam and i think i made up half of my answers</p>
<p>I finally went over the first 3 pages, ... Thanks everyone who helped on that one... I split it into 6 sections, which would also be correct but oviously two would be much much more efficient.</p>
<p>Malishka31: To check whether it is a maxima or minima, simply dump some points into the equation that are around the critical point you got. This is dangerous to do in other contexts(ie local max/min, saddle points), but it should be ok in this question.</p>
<p>yes well if you use the integral of the quadratic forumula and then quangulate the area between the ellipsoidial parabolic hyperbola you will then achieve the desired result.</p>