<p>Just 4 points ...
1. Yea, I'm stuck in the 90s. Blog is now "supply chain mgmt" or something like that. Pt. still remains. It's the single most notable program in the Smeal prortfolio. On the other end, the MIS or whatever they call the quantitative guys these days have had monumentally poor track record as a group. Simply too esoteric for most businesses. Tons ... and I mean TONS of capable, successful accountants ... because there are always TONS of accounting majors who are bright, capable. And when they graduate, they remain bright, capable.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>While it's all a beauty contest (and that doesn't mean it's not very important ... ask the past few winners of the American Idol gig), Lehigh ain't Slippery Rock and it ain't PSU in terms of perception. We are not enamored with the LU campus or its locale, but it's big time in terms of perception and selectivity. To suggest otherwise is naive. True, it's not Princeton, nor is anyplace else. It's the next tier down which ain't too shabby.</p></li>
<li><p>She's right about the Honors College @ PSU in terms of some of the kids there, but unfortunately they're like a drip in the ocean. Nice but for the masses, essentially so what, ho hum. Ironically, it's simply trying to place a Lehigh type environment in terms of registration, selectivity, elite opportunities, teaching/advising/research/instruction within th ocean of blue ... and white. It's like saying ... the traditional Penn State experience that the VAST majority receive ... is not sufficient to attract, educate and retain the top shelf kids. And they're right. That's the sole reason that the Chairman of Merrill Lynch (and former COB of PSU) said "we gotta do this" to get the Wall Street kids to come and graduate from PSU. So he and they did.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>With something like 20+ campuses, nearly 80,000 students, and on and on and on ... much as she hopes and suggests its not a "factory" ... well the numbers tell the tale. And it ain't pretty.</p>
<p>As has been noted on here and elsewhere, ironically, a Penn State research prof in higher education edited a somewhat monumental expose about the state of higher ed, noting that well over 80% of the masses are now matriculating to PSU type places not for their notable education, especially at the undergraduate level, but for their relatively cheaper cost ... as duly noted by the toneranger in her familial situation. The report indicates the vast majority of students are receiving the vast majority of their education in a passive, lecturing/note taking type of environment where TAs know the students better than the prof. That is most certainly the general experience at Penn State Main.</p>
<p>But no matter how one hopes, wishes, strives to portray these monolithical institutions (OHio State, MI State, MI, IU, MINN, Rutgers, UW, UCLA, Berkeley, and on and on) as warm fuzzy student-focused places, well the truth of the matter is so apparently somewhere else. btw, 2 PSU degrees on my wall. Loved being there, more rah rah than any 3 people could stand at least on Sat afternoons. We get back there many times a year. </p>
<p>But trying to sell the notion that it's not a factory production for undergrads at its essence is silly. I don't know what it's been of late, but during one stretch, over a period of 15 years or so, all but a few of the student determined "profs of the year" failed to get tenure. Why so? Obviously they were and no doubt remain superior instructors. Simply one reason ... NONE get tenured or promoted primarily on the basis of outstanding student teaching. The fact is that if a young prof spends too much time with undergraduate students, he/she is headed for Susquehanna or maybe even Lehigh. It truly is publish or perish. And most, no matter how talented, are not fully successful on both fronts.</p>
<p>But we all must rationalize these situations and make the most of whatever we decide ... Lehigh or Penn State or West Chester or ... </p>
<p>And the good news about it all is that there are n'er do wells who went to Princeton and there are investment banking VPs who went to SUNY @ Cobleskill. There are great teachers who went to Slippery Rock and there are total duds and alcoholics who went to Penn State. There are CPA partners who went to Butler County Community College then commuted to Pitt. There are US presidents who went to Soutwest Texas State and Eureka!!! College. (One of the greatest, in fact.) And there are many presidents from Yale, some not worth spitting on if they were on fire. </p>
<p>In the end ... there is only one somewhat defining answer. Whadya think about your years, did they provide some opportunities, did you connect with others who helped to carry you along. Othern that, it's a crapshoot, for the most part. But we do like to be justified in all of this.</p>