one-question personality test

[hazelorb]

<p>

Marion, Little John, Robin, Sheriff; based solely on morality and honesty.</p>

<p>Marion wished to save Robin, but assumed that the end justified the means. That doesn’t always work, but in this case, is acceptable.
Little John’s crime was to take advantage of the situation, seducing Marion at the expense of his friendship with Robin (assuming). The lesser of three evils.
Robin acted jealously, egocentrically, ungratefully, and unreasonably. He did, however, have a reason to be angry, which makes his behavior understandable.
The Sheriff took advantage of his position. He not only took advantage of Marion, but also failed in his duties as a jailkeeper. While he kept his promise, it was based on immoral grounds.

</p>

<p>Those are pretty much the exact same reasons I had for this order!
Maid Marion did something somewhat unmoral, but was honest about it and did not do it for selfish reasons (assumingly). Who can blame her for going off and trying to find happiness.
Little John is pretty sketchy, but in the end his actions benefitted Marion. Who knows if he was being honest. (Okay maybe it is apparent that I am a girl since I assumed the best of Marion and the worst of LJ lol)
Robin abused her?! Man. But he has high standards and you cannot fault him for leaving her.
Sheriff: His actions were completely selfish and morally despicable. Even though he did keep his promise (makes him honest), for some reason I think his morally reprehensible actions are worse than any other combination of lies+immoral behavior.</p>

<p>Maybe it’s like: possibly lying and being sketchy is not as bad as abuse which is not as bad as using sex for a bargaining tool. I dunno. But I thought it was interesting that we basically had the same reasoning - somewhat validates the analysis? Maybe? There are a lot of good orders though. The reasonings are the most interesting thing.</p>