<p>2200andbeyondXD,</p>
<p>I will second what xiggi and others are saying, stick with official SAT questions. Here is another reason: many SAT questions are repeats of what has been tested in the prior administrations of the test. Here is an example from the recent October 2012 SAT (Section 9, Q13):</p>
<p>“Company X packages cookies in boxes, targeting the weight of a box of cookies to be 500 grams. Any box of cookies that is within 15 grams of the target weight is acceptable. Which of the following represents all possible acceptable values of the weight, w, in grams, of a box of cookies?”</p>
<p>Answer: |w - 500| ≤ 15</p>
<p>You will see how similar it is to this question from Official SAT Study Guide 2nd Edition(TEST 5 SECTION 8 QUESTION 9):</p>
<p>“A regulation for riding a certain amusement park ride requires that a child be between 30 inches and 50 inches tall. Which of the following inequalities can be used to determine whether or not the child’s height H satisfies the regulation for this ride?”</p>
<p>Answer: |h - 40| < 10 </p>
<p>In fact, about 30% of the questions in the October SAT 2012 were more or less repeats or slight alterations of past questions. </p>
<p>Other than that ETS does a pretty good job of writing SAT questions. I know no one likes them but they are very thorough and professional when it comes to writing these questions. Here is why:</p>
<p>1) There is a group of very smart people who write and parse through these questions carefully, as opposed to random SAT sites that outsource questions to god knows who and where.
2) The questions are written very carefully and the language is very precise.
3) Each question has been pretested as part of the experimental section, thus eliminating questions that have any ambiguity. </p>
<p>Below is part of an answer on Quora from someone who worked for ETS writing multiple choice questions.
"However, to ETS’s credit, the tests are RIGOROUSLY tested.
ETS employs squadrons of statisticians. Every question is tested before being used, via the “experimental” section. This means that every scared test-taker is a guinea pig, doing work for which they receive no credit or compensation. But again, how else could ETS get real data to determine if a question is fair? And if a question has unusual results – way more whites, or men, get it right, for example – then they change or discard the question, even if it seems otherwise valid.</p>
<p>So, IMO, rant all you want about standardized testing, but ETS is actually doing a fair job of creating an unfair test."</p>
<p>Here is the complete link: <a href=“https://www.quora.com/Standardized-Tests/What-are-some-evil-or-unsavory-decisions-made-by-the-ETS-and-College-Board[/url]”>https://www.quora.com/Standardized-Tests/What-are-some-evil-or-unsavory-decisions-made-by-the-ETS-and-College-Board</a></p>