<p>Auburn, I tend to think of the dot com boom when it comes to CS/ IT. IT is down the drain, did you forget where it stood back in the day? IT was the *hit! and today, CCNA and A+ certified technicians are roaming about trying to break the 15/hr barrier. Although I dont see a similar fate for all CS related jobs, I think it will a struggle knowing that other majors like CompE and EE qualify for most of the jobs that are held by CS qualified individuals. </p>
<p>Another trend is the enrollment for cs students. It has decreased 60% according to Cornell Uni. Cornell happens to be a good school for engineering and science and I tend to take this statistic very seriously. A downward trend does not indicate in anyway the creation of new jobs , after all, thats what outsourcing is out to kill.</p>
<p>Now, I do think BLS is all right for a general estimate of things, but it does have flaws. It doesn’t include " storms " like recessions and the political nature of tech industry in this country. Things change fast. It happened before who is to tell it wont happen again?
A better approach to understanding CS layoffs and offshoring is to look at individual companies. This is a tedious task but it will give an accurate measurement of how much EE is prone to outsourcing compared to CS. </p>
<p>According to Little 'ole BLS, Computer scientists held about 28,900 jobs in 2008( not including computer engineers, remember, its not CS)</p>
<p>Electrical engineers 157,800
Electronics engineers, except computer 143,700</p>
<p>add em up, 305500 jobs held by EE blokes. Now tell me, </p>
<p>How does this “”“”“”" there will be more programmers working in the US in 10 years than there will be EEs “”“” make any sense to you? </p>
<p>With a projected growth <em>cough</em> ~20% , it will take a lot more than 10 years to catch up. All this assuming everything goes fine. We know it did in 2000 ;)</p>
<p>Dont take it personally, but I like to point out the facts. The only outsource-able field in EE is programming itself. Which is related to CS.</p>