<p>Hm. Sounds like choosing between a ghetto of socially withdrawn teetotallers and rehab violators VERSUS smelling others' vomit from thurs-sun. Not a pretty choice.</p>
<p>"There are a few kids genuinely interested in avoiding drunks and pot-heads"
pretty much describes our family. We have NO problems with occasional this-n-that. </p>
<p>But, I guess I was hoping he could simply reduce the amount of time spent being excessively distracted by garbage issues and drama that go along with the aftermaths of heavy, irresponsible party drinking by others. The "ick" factor -- vomit, 4 a.m. hollering cr*p.</p>
<p>In fairness, here's why I am thinking about it: His big brother had a stressful freshman year assigned to dorm with a real alcoholic (later many DUI'S, almost ran someone over, school suspended...). The roomie brought in all his friends all week, and they accidentally fell and broke stuff (like his musical instrument); vomited on the rug but nobody would clean it...obnoxiousness. </p>
<p>My S moved out second term (to a great situation). But, what a hassle, and wasted energy. </p>
<p>Meanwhile, when I met kids from the sub-free dorms, THEY seemed chill, made good friends that year, had a real social circle that continued. </p>
<p>I was left thinking after that, since that school had substance free dorms, maybe it attracted nicer kids and left the crummier ones for the substance-using dorms? idk. </p>
<p>So now, I think: why not play the odds, stack the deck to avoid that kind of HUGE grief this time around, with youngest S. So I wondered if his checking off sub-free would help steer away from all that garbageness. No guarantees, but just try to avoid the worst hassles that his brother had, b/c I'm sure those friends of the first roommate wouldn't have been caught dead in a sub-free dorm.</p>