<p>Everyone, thank you so much for your support and your great ideas. It is so helpful to be able to write here and get such thoughtful feedback.</p>
<p>I think it’s probably not so much that my brothers oppose me, but they’re hearing everything second-hand, from only one source, and are forced to trust that I’m giving them all relevant information. For example, they wanted me to ask the urologist exactly what the risks of cystectomy are. That specific information doesn’t matter to me. Two doctors whom I trust have told me that it’s unacceptably dangerous, and that’s enough for me. But then, I had the advantage of having those conversations directly with the doctors; I saw the expressions on the faces, and heard the tones of voice, which gave credibility to the statement. My brothers haven’t had that benefit; all they have is my account of the words that were said.</p>
<p>And to be fair, I know that they have Dad’s best interest at heart. They’re just not sure whether I’m exaggerating on the one hand, or holding back on the other; one may even think that I’m giving them slanted information to get them to agree to the decision I want. I also think they are having a hard time accepting that there’s not a better way out of this, and may even halfway hope that if I quiz the doctors enough, they will unveil the hidden key to the happy ending. </p>
<p>I did have a follow-up conversation with the urologist today, though, and I’m going to email that info to my brothers. Then if that’s not enough for them, I believe I’m going to tell them that I have all the information I need, but if they don’t, I’m going to invite them to come here and meet with the doctors themselves, and get ALL of their questions answered. (Fang, what I’m envisioning is a family meeting with the doctor, so that he only has to say it once, and everyone hears the same thing at the same time. No doctor-in-the-middle. Do you think that’s out of bounds?) I also really think they ought to have a face-to-face with Mom, to assure themselves that she knows what’s going on and understands the choices. </p>
<p>One other not-so-nice aspect to this is that one of my brothers and I have a trust problem, and some of this is CYA on my part. What I really, really don’t want is, a year from now or 5 years, for there to be second-guessing about what I’m telling them, or wondering why I didn’t ask this or that question. Or if, down the road, Mom says that she actually wanted aggressive treatment but I wouldn’t allow it (and it’s possible she would do that), they’ll know that’s not the case. If they hear it directly from her now, there won’t be doubts later. </p>
<p>bookreader and eso, I actually don’t have to be doing any of this. I am Dad’s POA, so I could make a unilateral decision which no one could dispute unless they wanted a court fight which they would lose. What I’m trying to do is preserve the family by working toward consensus; years from now after Mom and Dad are long gone, I want to still have brothers. At the same time, I do feel that I have done more than enough, and I agree 100% that if they need more, they’ll have to take on that responsibility for themselves. Thank you for the validation on that.</p>
<p>Fang, I hadn’t thought about that loss-aversion orientation. I will keep that in mind as we go forward. Thank you.</p>
<p>travelnut – “scenic route.” Thanks for yet another nugget, and a helpful way to think and communicate about this.</p>