<p>I understand that many companies are trying to figure out how they’re going to charge for it since it wasn’t built in to the actuarial analysis, and that a number that currently offer single coverage or family coverage are going to go to pricing that varies more based on the number covered: single +1, single + 2, single +3, and single +>3. The other option is to bundle it up into family coverage, likely increasing the costs for all the families that don’t cover post-college dependents. So much for Obama’s promise that if we liked our health insurance, we could keep it.</p>