<p>Originaloog, I don't know about your school, but at mine, something like Marchig Band Section Leader is a major activity that requires hours and hours of time. I really believe that not listing it in an attempt to not bore your reader would be a mistake and underestimate the student.</p>
<p>I guess I take the dissenting view from a majority of the thread's posters, as I am all for including the activities that most of you see as "filler" or "fluff." I think that something like one year of chess club or even National Honor Society is significant enough to warrant space on a resume. Although clearly I think that "awards" like Who's Who and all that should be omitted, I think that admissions officers would react better to a student that oversold rather than undersold himself.</p>
<p>To give you a real-life example, I listed the most significant activities on my resume first: things like math team, newspaper, literary club, marching band, and varsity sports teams. However, I am also dedicated to other activities that take less time but are still important as well--such as Key Club, National Honor Society, Tri-M Music Honor Society, etc. I think that admissions officers do not ASSUME anything. If you do not specifically say that you belong to the NHS, there is no reason for them to believe that you are and are just condensing your list. They look at what you HAVE done, and don't think things like, "Oh, she has over a 90 GPA, so she must be a member of NHS and just didn't put it down." Remember, not everyone is as overachieving as those on CC! If NHS is not on the list, an adcom probably won't consider the fact that the student made a conscious effort to cut that list down.</p>
<p>Also, the point about bringing up these extra activities in the interview rather than on the resume may be a detriment to the student. During my interview, my interviewer just asked me direct questions about the clubs I was involved in and copied down my answers. There was not much discussion, just a restatement of my resume. I would not depend on a busy interviewer to add facts to your application that you could have easily included yourself. I don't think an interview is the appropriate place for new information, just enhancing what's already in your applicaton. And isn't it rumored that the interview carries far less weight, than say, the application, anyway?</p>
<p>I guess you can take my opinion with as much a grain as salt as anyone's. I believe that I put together a successful application, and I'm just sharing what I think got me in. Hope this helps.</p>