Pattern of UC Acceptances

<p>Is there a pattern for uc acceptances? Like why do people get acceptances earlier than others?</p>

<p>regents recipients get acceptances earlier</p>

<p>You mean for Irvine? UCLA engineering letter came out, so if you didn't get that, and you applied for engineering, chances are you didn't get in.</p>

<p>minus scholarships and early applicants...i guess the regular applicants</p>

<p>Have any physics majors been accepted yet??</p>

<p>wait peppers, are you serious? T_T</p>

<p>Generally yes. There have been a "few" exceptions, but general trends show that if you don't get a letter from UCLA engineering, your chances are slim.</p>

<p>darn it... that's not cool...
so the people that get admissions on the last day are all from other majors?</p>

<p>If on your application, you put no alternate major for your alternate major, does that also mean undeclared?</p>

<p>Thank you very much.</p>

<p>Can anyone confirm about not getting a letter from UCLA (applied to engineering) means a rejection?</p>

<p>If you applied for any major listed as "College of Letters and Science", you basically applied as an undeclared anyways.</p>

<p>As for the confirmation of the letter, if you go into the UCLA forum from last year, there were quite a few posts about that. Everyone that posted on the forum and either got or didn't get the letter followed that pattern (ie. those that didn't get it didn't get in). Of course, there are people who's friends or friends friends apparently got in, but that's not within the realm of "likely" in any case.</p>

<p>Ah, thanks. Do you happen to know when these letters were sent out?</p>

<p>Apparently the letter version came today. The email was sent on Thursday.</p>