<p>"'Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show the Pentagon seriously considered making a 'gay bomb,' which allegedly would have turned soldiers in the field gay."</p>
<p>"The documents show the Air Force lab asked for $7.5 million to develop such a chemical weapon."</p>
<p>"'The Ohio Air Force lab proposed that a bomb be developed that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soldiers to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistibly attractive to one another,' Hammond said after reviewing the documents."</p>
<p>?????????
rofl
Way to make a point that homosexuality would destroy the military. Obviously, raging sexaholics would be pose a different concern but being gay doesn't necessarily mean you will hump any guy that catches your eye.
And what about the presence of women for straight men?? I know it's probably harder for them to have a quickie (suggesting that it's easier for gays to get distracted) but still, this proposal fails because it takes a side. If they had proposed a heterosexual sex bomb, the effect would probably be the same.</p>
<p>I misread the article. I thought this was an effort by US military officials to emphasize the chaos that allowing gays in the US military would bring, but it's actually the enemies that will be the targets of this "gay bomb." And in cases where women comprise only a tiny percentage of the military, if at all, the heterosexual sex bomb would not work as well as the gay one. I see the logic there...
After this realization, I'm not so sure I disapprove of this proposal after all, lol.</p>
<p>
You better believe it! I know... made me feel like I was in a twilight zone. You guys must admit, though, that it's a creative (and peaceful) attempt to defeat the enemy.</p>