Interestingly, I think I knew what you meant right away, because my S24 thinks in a similar way.
Even if there is always some sort of underlying distribution, for him most things are more like they have to meet a certain threshold, get past a certain filter, pass a litmus test, or whatever. And that can be a high standard. But among the colleges that do meet all those standards, he really isn’t further ranking them by those factors (not as far as I can tell), they are all on the “good” list more or less equally.
And then maybe a few things remain a relative ranking, but I have been a little surprised at how few.
I actually think this is a very mature attitude, in that I think he basically recognizes the practical wisdom of not letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. And so he is basically looking for colleges that will be very good in every way that matters to him, not the “better” school in one way that will not be very good for him in some other important way. And I really appreciate that.
But that being said, we’re now at the phase where we have identified a few too many colleges like that, and I think he would benefit from cutting a few more. He also has one favorite which he is applying to early, so that’s good. But then depending on how things go with that college, he might want to decide on an ED II school. And then depending on how things went with that, he might just need to decide where to go to college among two or more colleges that were all good in every important way.
And it is not clear to me exactly how he would make those decisions if his favorite doesn’t work out. Nor does it have to be clear to me, of course–I completely agree all his colleges would be great for him, and he could pick one out of a hat and I would be cool with that.
But it is definitely an interesting byproduct of his way of thinking that even sitting here in September, I really only know how he personally ranks two, maybe three, of his colleges.