<p>Hey guys.. so I'm going to take the physics SAT2 and have already covered everything regarding mechanics, thermal physics, waves, and optics</p>
<p>Now i just have electricity and magnetism and modern physics left. I self-studied the rest with the help of my general physics class. I am currently using Princeton Review. Is it possible to self-study electricity and magnetism and modern physics on my own through princeton review and sparknotes by november 7th?</p>
<p>Oh and really how hard are the electricity and magnetism questions on the sat2?</p>
<p>Nothing is impossible. If you all DO happen to say that it is impossible, then I’ll either seek information from more reliable sources, or continue on with my studying and get as much done as I can before the 7th of Novemeber.</p>
<p>Magnetism is a tad tricky, and if you have no chemistry background, parts of the modern physics might throw you off, but don’t worry, I got through the same situation (except worse. I didn’t do waves, parts of thermo, electricity, modern physics, or optics at all), and still managed a 800. If you’re self reliant and you know how to teach yourself concepts, you’ll be fine (because you’ll have to do this in college, so it’s good to start now)</p>
<p>So here is a question from Barron’s 8th Edition:</p>
<p>An object with a constant mass rest on a smooth and perfectly horizontal table. If a horizontal force “F” is applied, acceleration “a” results. If the F is doubled without changing the direction,what will be the effect(s) on the acceleration?</p>
<p>I. The acceleration will remain the same.
II. The acceleration will be doubled.
III.The acceleration will decrease.
IV.The acceleration will increase but not double.</p>
<p>A.) I, II and III only
B.) I and III only
C.) II and IV only
D.) IV only
E.) none of the above</p>
<p>I chose “E”, because I thought only II is the correct one, but the answer given in the book is “C”. Can someone explain?</p>
<p>Some things really are impossible Anyway, if there is friction, then the answer would actually be D: the new net force (2F - friction) is not double the old net force (F - friction). But normally, “smooth” is used to mean “frictionless”. In any case, answer C is self-contradictory. Not unusual in Barron’s to have mistakes or poorly worded problems, IMO.</p>
<p>That is just not possible! If there’s friction, the acceleration will be double, but if there’s no friction then acceleration can’t be more than double, it could be less than double, because some of the force would then be consumed in overcoming the friction.</p>