<p>These are the two books I have bought to review on materials in the week prior to the test. I am not too worried about the tests because I felt like I did well in both subjects throughout the year, but I do want some input on the books. How are the books in general? Do they cover all the topics necessary? If not, for each book, what areas should I go through in more detail? And are their practice tests harder or easier compared to the actual test? If you have any more advice/comments, please go ahead and post it. All commentary is welcome.</p>
<p>Barrons for M IIC: overpreparation..
physics: i have no clue</p>
<p>How accurate would you say are the practice tests though? And by over preparation, do you mean they cover stuff heavily that appears rarely on the test? </p>
<p>Waiting for some other ppl to contribute.</p>
<p>the barron math II is a lot harder than the real test but it covers the same topics just more difficult questions I would recomend using it because if you can get about a 700 on a barrons test the real one will be a sinch</p>
<p>Barron's math 2 Q's seem to all roughly be as hard as the last 10 Q's on the real test. This is good practice if you are already well prepared. However, quite a few of the problems rely too heavily on calculator programs that you are expected to have.</p>
<p>I'm taking the Math I test (taking Math II next year). Anyways, I have both the 2008 Barron's book and the older (~2002) for Math I. I feel that the older one is a lot harder. Has the test changed? Two different people wrote the book...is the 2008 version still tougher than the real SAT II Test?</p>