<p>What? If I recall I accounted the big number of views to “curious people”, not just a couple of guys. Can’t you get it?</p>
<p>You seem to be unable to have an adequate discussion.</p>
<p>For example, don’t change the meanings of my words.
I didn’t say there are plenty of mules-and-relatives in CC … just ONE.</p>
<p>;)</p>
<p>lol couple of things i did not change anything u said MY theory was that at least 50 capable people saw the thread and did not give advice (this would by ur def be a mule) so if my theory is right then those 50 people would be mules in ur opinion right? ok…</p>
<p>YOUR theory is that aside from the couple of guys (me u and that other guy) who left a comment NONE of the other 200+ people had taken the test and had advice to give rather they were ALL CURIOUS people…adopt whichever theory u choose but i think mine is more believable…for instance i have never clicked on a biology or french thread…wonder why that is???</p>
<p>but if u HONESTLY believe that aside from us three people there was not ONE SINGLE other person that had taken the test clicked on the thread and simply chose not to give advice then thats fine too</p>
<p>i am perfectly able to have an adequate discussion, people that are not capable of it are the ones who insult the other person…for instance calling another person a mule or a synonym. i dont feel a need to insult people that i debate with and i dont because i feel my arguments speak for themselves there is no reason to be irrational and start dishing out insults as u have done many times and i have not…nor will i in the future call u stupid or a mule etc but then again i guess its just my opinion…</p>
<p>u obviously think that the best way to win an adequate discussion is through insults</p>
<p>“What? If I recall I accounted the big number of views to “curious people”, not just a couple of guys. Can’t you get it?”</p>
<p>and i have no idea what ur talking about here…i dont think i need to keep arguing with a person who makes random incoherent sentences that have nothing to do with the topic at hand</p>
<p>so u win the argument ok??? if it means SO much to u that u will pull out irrelevant sentences and insult me…u win the argument geez</p>
<p>Dude, let me tell you this: I’ve had fun arguing with you.
No hard feelings :D</p>
<p>But really, I consider CC as a great place where you can help yourself and others. So I was a bit surprised when I read your post. Do you really believe you’ll help competitors if you share the names of a few books?</p>
<p>And, are you American?</p>
<p>will ap physics B be sufficient to take the SAT2 physics exam? or do u NEED knowledge from ap physics C as well?</p>
<p>dude u dont need ANY ap physics of B OR C chillllll…there is nothing that shouldnt be covered in a regular high school physics book ive said this three times now</p>
<p>and danielcarp it has been fun…i will miss it 
hahaha but yeah im american…why?</p>
<p>I do say, it’s time for some memes!</p>
<p>{meme}
dude08: he lieks teh Amerikun mudkipz. lulz.
{/meme}</p>
<p>What’s the curve on the SAT II Physics? (How hard is it to get an 800?)</p>
<p>To answer the OP’s question, I would say you have to review with some test-prep books. I like the Barron’s books quite a lot.</p>