Pilot Season Blues/What's to Come

<p>I usually try to help out around here this time of year and thought I’d repost an article by producer Gavin Polone I saw on another forum as a note of explanation for any old timers who might have noted my absence. It might also help give some perspective to this year’s seniors. All the stress of college auditions followed by the seeming eternity of waiting and then decision time is no doubt a tough, tough, tough rite of passage. Hell, I remember maintaining a steady diet of heads I’d bitten off from it, but might have been able to relax a little more and maybe even enjoy my senior year if I knew what I’d be dealing with in seven years ... </p>

<p>
[quote]
Hollywood is one month into pilot season. By the end of February, the networks will have culled the scripts they had been developing during the prior half-year and will order a select group of pilots for production. (Final decisions on which of these go to series is made in May.) But as the chosen scripts are anointed, the television industry becomes all about casting these projects. It is indisputable that a great script that has been miscast will fail and that a mediocre script with a terrific lead or leads may very well succeed. Yet for all of its importance, the process of casting pilots — for those actors who aren’t among the very small number well known enough to simply be offered a show outright – is, ironically, so strained and grueling that it doesn’t afford actors the opportunity to be cast in the show best suited to them, nor the producers a position of confidence that they have hired the best ensemble available.</p>

<p>As most of the new shows for any given season are made in March and April, almost all of the casting for them is done during the first three months of the year. Since the big four networks average about twenty total comedy and drama pilots each in any given year and the CW does several more, that is a lot of roles to fill in a relatively short period of time. The process starts with the hiring of a casting director, and the top tier of these actor scouts usually commit to between two and five pilots at once. Since most series, once picked up, hold on to the casting director from the pilot, it makes sense that they would want to do as many as possible, as the chances of getting a job on a series drop significantly later in the year. But no matter what they may say, a casting director can’t do a great job if they are spread too thin — and that's exactly what happens when they focus on more than one pilot at the same time. Casting directors always bring in the actors they know well for all of their projects, and that's understandable, since they believe in them. But if a casting director is challenged for time, he or she will sacrifice auditioning new people and just stick to the familiar. This is one reason why we end up seeing the same actors in so many shows: Doesn’t it seem like Alex O’Loughlin, Natalie Zea, and Breckin Meyer have been in at least half of the pilots produced in the last ten years? </p>

<p>On two occasions, I’ve had friends of mine at smaller talent agencies call me to complain that they couldn’t get their clients in for a preliminary audition on my pilots and they've asked me to intervene: Agents at smaller agencies aren’t treated with the same respect as those at the bigger ones even though they are the ones discovering most of the new prospects. In both of those situations, I forced the casting director to bring in the actors and both of them ended up with the parts. One of those actors went on to become a well-known lead on a long-running NBC drama, even though the pilot he did for me didn’t make it to series.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, actors are horribly and sabotagingly overextended during pilot season. An actress who has been through eight pilot seasons kept a record of a typical year and described it to me: She auditioned for 30 pilots, reading directly for the producers, and was called back five or six times; she then had five "studio tests" (where she auditioned for the studio execs before being brought to the network execs); she was subsequently cut from one project at this stage and tested for the network execs on the remaining four, landing the part on one of them … which didn't make it to series. That is a tremendous amount of work to get one pilot, since the actors are expected to memorize two or three scenes per audition, and sometimes go in on two or three auditions in a day. A casting director of several successful series told me that most actors aren't given the entire script of the pilot for which they are auditioning, just the scenes they are using in the audition, known as “sides." Therefore, they can’t really create an appropriate character: "They get the material at the last minute, they don't prepare enough, they read as some version of who they are, and they leave.” When I asked the actress how she felt about the process after eight seasons, she said, “When it is last minute, it impacts preparation … If I had more time, I would be so much better.” More significant, the fact that she’s been in to see the same producers, directors, and casting directors so many times on so many pilots over the years gets her down. "Now, sometimes," she says, "I feel like a ‘stale face.’ I feel like my expiration date is coming soon.”</p>

<p>And ultimately, who gets cast can have little to do with acting ability anyway. Rather, because there are so many pilots competing for the same pool of talent, timing and competition issues can frustratingly undermine an actor getting cast in the right role. Studios and networks always demand that any actor going in to test for a show sign a "test deal," which says they can't accept another deal within a five- to ten-day period following their test; such contracts are required so an actor won’t be able to use the after-the-fact leverage of having beaten out the competition in order to negotiate a better deal for themselves. Most networks and studios will not test someone if they are being held by another pilot under one of these deals, therefore these actors are kept off the market even though they might not get the pilot that is tying them up. Meanwhile, their compensation for being held in this way is zero. </p>

<p>Worse, there are many times when producers and executives test and hold actors they have no intention of casting for a particular role. The usual number of candidates to bring to the network for a part is three to five, and even if the producers have one or two clear favorites in mind, they'll bring in a few extra as "filler" so the network doesn't feel like they're having someone forced on them. So if an actor is held on a pilot that they have little or no chance of getting, they will be blocked from going up for another pilot for which they are the best candidate. Most every actor I know has experienced a situation like this.</p>

<p>The only way around this snarled process would be to evenly spread out the making of pilots throughout the year, which would mean the end of broadcast networks launching most of their shows in the fall. People have talked about year-round development and series launches since I’ve been in the business, not because it would make for better casting but rather because it is difficult to effectively market a large number of shows when everyone is doing so simultaneously. No network has ever taken the lead to make a real attempt at changing the schedule, but now is the time to do it. Evidence of the viability of year-round development and pilot production can be seen with the various cable networks who intentionally cast, produce, and launch their pilots and series when the networks are not, and it is pretty hard to argue that the cable nets are not now producing better product. So primarily this move would help the very survival of the network business, but as a bonus these changes would make it easier on actors. I think there is a common notion that acting is more about how you look than ability and effort. But being an actor, especially when you’re just starting out and have to support yourself with outside work, is really tough, and trying to get a regular part on a TV series during pilot season is the toughest thing an actor can do. So when you watch a new show next September on ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, or the CW and there is someone on it whose performance you like, I hope you’ll respect them a bit more now knowing what they went through to get that job.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Here's a link to the original article ... Polone:</a> How Pilot Season Ensures That Great Actors Rarely Land the Right Shows -- Vulture</p>

<p>I saw this last night and the only response I could muster was, "Le sigh ..."</p>

<p>Wow, I guess anybody who wants to do film acting has to go through this? Not enough movie roles?</p>

<p>I know the pay for TV series work is fantastic…</p>

<p>Are the number of roles in network series very disproportionate to the number of roles in cable series?</p>

<p>Hope things are going well for you, Fish. Previous posts of yours have hinted that you’ve been working. :)</p>

<p>Thanks for posting this–this is good to know. My younger son has an agent and he hasn’t experienced pilots, but has experienced this on a much smaller scale (we live close to NYC). For one well known channel, my son auditioned several times for the SAME role. Each time we had to shlep up to NYC. They kept changing the age and character of the two leads, and kept changing casting directors (3 in about a month!). First the character was 16, then 14, then 18 looking like 16, then back to 16. First he was cool, then he was geeky, then he was a skateboard dude. Ugh. </p>

<p>There’s just a lot of tough ‘business’ in the ‘business of acting’. Stage acting too of course. You really, really, really have to love what you’re doing. We all know this, but it’s hard in practice. I think what really tears people down is how much luck and non-talent is involved. It can be hard to take. That’s why you really need to love what you’re doing.</p>

<p>I hope you’re doing well and am thinking positive thoughts for you in pilot season!</p>

<p><<and ultimately,="" who="" gets="" cast="" can="" have="" little="" to="" do="" with="" acting="" ability="" anyway.="">></and></p>

<p>fish, this is, I think, one of the most difficult thing for young actors to accept. They really have a hard time (when they are young and just starting out – like, auditioning for places in a college class, for example) accepting that talent is almost the least of it. </p>

<p>The waiting for the college decision letters to roll in is just the beginning. Once they are in, they begin (one hopes) to learn how things really work, and how casting really happens (or doesn’t) and why. Young performers come into the field believing with all their hearts that if they are talented and keep plugging away, they will “make it” meaning, they will be cast. But that’s not necessarily true. As hoveringmom says above, it can be very disheartening to find out that so many things other than talent (looks, type) are involved.</p>

<p>The smart ones who are also talented figure that out (what type they are and what they can do with that) and run with it.</p>

<p>NJTM,
There are plenty of parts to go around in film, but TV is now being seen as more profitable by the people up the business chain. There’s actually a big civil war going on right now at one of the top agencies amongst the senior people some of whom want to stay the course with film and others who want to steer the ship more towards TV. The grass - we actors - tends to get trampled when those elephants go at it. But yeah … TV auditions are definitely part of the reality for a young, unestablished actor in LA if you’re lucky enough to be with a decent agent who would probably laugh you out of the room if you said you only wanted to do film. You’d better book some, too, if you don’t want to get dropped …</p>

<p>Talent isn’t the least consideration, but it’s definitely just one. Everybody is “too something” that has nothing to do with it the vast majority of the time besides all the weird business considerations. For instance, I have to accept that I’m often “too tall” to be cast next to some of the shorter leading men. Type and brand are also obviously huge considerations although the people on the business side are really the ones who make the decision as to what that is once you get your foot in the door. For those of us who spent years cultivating range, it’s really the sweet spot in that range that causes them to see dollar signs that you get stuck with at first. It’s not necessarily an artistic dead end, though. As a case in point, Juilliard graduate Keith David is a character guy who tends to fly under the public radar although he‘s one of the most prolific screen actors around. [Check</a> out his reel and notice the range he gets to play.](<a href=“Keith David Acting Reel - YouTube”>Keith David Acting Reel - YouTube) Although it’s often overlooked, the old Hollywood maxim of “Most actors can do one thing, the good ones can do two and the greats can do three or more” does still hold true. He’s one of the greats. Great guy, too, btw. </p>

<p>And for more blood and guts on the nuttiness of this reality, I recommend an article by sitcom writer Ken Levine entitled [“Guys</a> Are Not Going to Want to F*** Her.”](<a href=“http://kenlevine.blogspot.com/2010/02/guys-are-not-going-to-want-to-■■-her.html]“Guys”>By Ken Levine: Guys are not going to want to f**k her) Meh … Nobody held a gun to my head and said I had to pursue this as a career … and I’m honestly having a blast! :)</p>

<p>Are you kids still sure you want this? ;)</p>

<p>Fish, my daughter (who is about to graduate in May from NYU Tisch and made the move from MT to the film acting studio at NYU) does. I am not sure why. The tv and film stuff seems even crazier (if that is possible) to me than musical theater … But thanks for the words of wisdom. PLEASE keep posting. Please. It’s a comfort (to me, at least) to read what such a smart, articulate actor has to say about the field and the business.</p>

<p>That Keith David reel is really something. I hadn’t realized that it was possible to view acting reels online, but it makes perfect sense. </p>

<p>According to imdb, Keith David is going to be in the upcoming film “Cloud Atlas,” based on one of my favorite novels, and he also has top billing in an in-production film called “Don’t Pass Me By.”</p>

<p>The classically trained Marianne Jean-Baptiste (Mike Leigh’s “Secrets and Lies,” the TV series “Without a Trace”) is another person who I guess you’d call a character actor who fascinates me.</p>

<p>Pilot season sounds utterly unbelievable. But for many actors, I guess it only lasts a couple of months? Unless, as Levine describes, you are cast…in that case, I guess you can’t be relatively sure until September - or even after - whether you will be retained?</p>

<p>The whole pilot season thing sounds exhausting in the extreme. I would suspect that it is a very lucrative time of year for personal stylists. :)</p>

<p>I love Keith David. Anyone who wants to hear hours and hours of his gorgeous voice should watch the Ken Burns Jazz series from PBS.</p>

<p>I watched a documentary on Netflix recently called The Face is Familiar. Great stuff about being a working actor, particularly “character actor,” in films and TV.</p>

<p>There is so much more to life than being a star.</p>