<p>Wellesley is a significantly wealthier school than Penn, on a per-student endowment basis. Penn’s 2006 [url=<a href="http://www.nacubo.org/documents/research/2006NES_Listing.pdf%5Dendowment%5B/url">http://www.nacubo.org/documents/research/2006NES_Listing.pdf]endowment[/url</a>] was estimated at $5.4 billion in 2006, while Wellesley’s was $1.4 billion. But Penn has about 20,000 students, while Wellesley has about 2,300. This translates to about $600,000 per student at Wellesley, compared to less than half that at Penn. Wellesley is one of the wealthiest schools in the country by this measure, while Penn is not.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Wellesley puts all of its ample resources into one thing: undergraduate instruction in liberal arts. Penn has fewer dollars per student, and those dollars are spread thinner, because they have to support many, many things that Wellesley doesn’t -- like the engineering school, the medical school, the business school, the law school, PhD research in all disciplines, and Division I athletics. </p>
<p>The bottom line is that Wellesley has much more money to throw at undergraduate liberal arts majors than Penn does. I haven’t been to either campus in recent years, but you should check them both out. I suspect you’ll find better facilities (e.g. dormitories, cafeteria food, landscaping, etc) and better undergraduate instruction (smaller classes, no grad student TAs, friendlier professors) at Wellesley. </p>
<p>You might have trouble distinguishing the average Penn classroom, cafeteria, or dorm from a Penn State classroom, cafeteria, or dorm. But I suspect you will be able to identify the Wellesley classroom, cafeteria, or dorm (and not just by the absence of men). Wellesley spends more on their undergraduates, and if you compare the two schools, I think you'll find that it shows.</p>