<p>I teach this material, and to me the F is harsh, but I read that others differ. I guess I'm a softie, but my typical grade in this situation is SEE ME and don't even give a grade until assignment is redone. I guess others feel the grade shows the seriousness of the situation.</p>
<p>I have found TA's to be among the most difficult graders, and the grading varies wildly from one TA to the next. Sometimes showing the paper to the prof. is in order. </p>
<p>If the paper really does merit that grade for being completely off topic I would not suggest writing center. I also have a son with ADD, and I think a thinking, not writing, problem is in order here. </p>
<p>Your son may not fully understand that a paper on honor and a paper on wrath are not the same thing. In his mind, if the assigned paper is on the Iliad and his paper is on the Iliad, this is the same thing. I try to get my students to differentiate between what I call "stream-of-consciousness-thinking" and analytic thinking. They are used to doing the former. If wrath reminds the student of honor, the student goes drifting along to honor as a subject. The way I get students to cure this tendency is to redraft topic as a question. Once the questions is devised, "How is the wrath of Achilles" etc, or "Does the wrath of Achilles," "Does Achilles regret his wrath,", "Is Achilles wrath justified? Is Agamemnon's?" "What ends Achilles wrath", and there are many more. </p>
<p>Organizing a paper around a question lets the young writer know if s(he) has fully dealt with the topic, on topic. A small outline with supportive points is also helpful. </p>
<p>The question need not appear in the finished paper because the paper is the answer to the question. </p>
<p>I agree with previous posters. This is the most important skill for a freshman to learn. I do, however, respectfully disagree. I think the grader's comments were out of line and unnecessarily hurtful. I'm sure this student is now intimidated.</p>
<p>I agree with whichever poster advised doing the paper immediately and then coming home for the weekend. TLC is in order IMO.</p>
<p>To poster who said D is emailing her paper to reporter father, I can't remember who this was. This is a very attractive trap (I should know, I've fallen into myself on several occasions) because it is a human tendency for a more experienced writer to edit the work of a young, less adept writer. This robs the young writer from learning form her/his teacher, and it blurs the line for students between what is and isn't their own work. I have had students tell me that if it was their ideas, it doesn't matter who does the actual writing. Suggestions, drawing someone's attention to difficulties, all okay. Out and out editing is not good. (And I have been on both sides of the process, as the parent and as the teacher.)</p>