<p>new essay: i think its better</p>
<pre><code>Changes occur all the time; whether significant or meaningless. The history of war is a testimony to that statement. Drastic events that occur in war ignite change through force and necessity.
</code></pre>
<p>United States’ policy of isolationism is a perfect illustration because it was inevitably doomed to end. After World War II, America did not want to be associated with external affairs, and especially war. However, the United States’ policy was ineffective and constantly tested by Axis powers Germany and Japan (Lusitania and Pearl Harbor). U.S. President Truman remained stubborn to isolationism until December 7, 1941, the day of infamy in which Truman was forced to end isolationism. After America had been attacked, Truman took a necessary and ambivalent approach by declaring war: he had to raise morale and show the general public and the world that the U.S. could not be easily invaded. Change does not only apply to political policies but it also has relevance to people. </p>
<p>Change particularly affects human philosophy and their emotional state. War veterans who experienced the sick horrors of war vividly demonstrate a dramatic difference. After witnessing the atrocities of war, many soldiers suffer from post dramatic syndrome and are either emotionally or mentally damaged to a degree. The traumatic events forced change upon soldiers exemplified through their behaviors.</p>
<p>History has repeatedly pointed out: radical war events motivate change. Either compelled or imperative to act; for better or for worse the power of change is unquestioned. The future welfare of mankind is up to how the dominion of change is used.</p>