Please help a confused future Chem Eng

<p>Finally the madness of college admission results is over. Though I have reasonably good stat (4.0 uw and 4.6w GPA, rank 5/370, SAT 2320 (760,780,780 in a single sitting); SAT2 Math2 800, Chem 800, US Hist 790; ACT composite 35; 9APs) I could not get a place in Princeton and UC Berkeley (because I am an OOS, UCB tightened the OOS quota for this year). I did write good essays and have reasonable EC with a few awards, science research, and over 600 Community Services hours, however, these stat, essays and awards were not enough for them. Oh well, life goes on !</p>

<p>While waitlisted in Stanford, I got admissions at UT Austin, Rice, Carnegie Mellon, Univ of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), Case Western and Univ of Minnesota.</p>

<p>With my interest in Chem Eng, I am selecting UT Austin because, I believe, UT Austin, UIUC, Minnesota, Rice, Case and Carnegie Mellon are all about the same in Chem Eng rank, but in my case, Austin will be close to home and also from financial aspect. I presume they all are a rank below MIT, UCB, Stanford and Caltech. Well, let me console myself , I am reserving these big four for my Graduate studies per se.</p>

<p>I have visited both Stanford and UT Austin. Stanford is awesome but Austin is not bad, and if I go to UT Austin I will be close to my family, just over 2.5 hour drive. Looking at curriculums, both UT Austin and Stanford have good courses and I feel I am a good fit. Also, as I am interested in nanotech, semiconductor and energy areas, both have excellent faculties doing research in these areas.</p>

<p>1) My question is how likely I can get in Stanford from waitlist (they say there are about 750 (2% of total ~38,000 applicants))? I know it is hard to say, but based on past records if any one has..</p>

<p>2) Is it worth going to Stanford and paying ~$250,000 for 4 year tuition and room&board ? At UT Austin, I will be an in-state student from the second year as my dad’s job has been relocated to Texas recently, and UT has given me a good scholarship (over $7,000 per each year for 4 years) through its Engineering Honors Program. So my tuition fees from second year will be less than $5,000 per year. I expect to get some research work too from the second year onward. So, the total will be about $80,000 or less for 4 year tuition and room&board.</p>

<p>3) How well is UT Austin BS Chem Eng Degree recognized? If I maintain a good GPA (hypothetically, over 3.9) and have good summer research experiences, can I get admission to MIT, UCB, Stanford or Caltech for a PhD Program? </p>

<p>4) Finally, hypothetically, if I get a Ph. D from one of these four, will the BS of UT Austin still be a point to frown over when I apply for a job in say Boing, Intel, big oil companies, etc..</p>

<p>My parent are asking me to make up my mind asap. I would appreciate your comments/ advices..</p>

<p>Thanks..</p>

<p>Edit: not helpful</p>

<p>

NO. If your family is wealthy and they can easily afford it, then the answer is YES.
Why are they pushing you for an answer? Seems like it is worth thinking about.</p>

<p>@ da6onet - Sorry for the long message, the questions for this forum are:</p>

<p>1) How well is UT Austin BS Chem Eng Degree recognized? If I maintain a good GPA (hypothetically, over 3.9) and have good summer research experiences, can I get an admission to MIT, UCB, Stanford or Caltech for a PhD Program? </p>

<p>2) Hypothetically, if I get a Ph. D from one of these four, will the BS of UT Austin still be a point to frown over when I apply for a job in say Boing, Intel, big oil companies, etc…</p>

<p>Thanks…</p>

<p>UT Austin will not hold you back in getting into PhD programs or jobs in chemical engineering.</p>

<p>And once you have a PhD nobody will care where you got your BS.</p>

<p>The reality is that you will not get off of the wait list at Stanford so move on. If you think you like Stanford over UT Austin then you should be looking real hard at Rice and make your decision based on the fit b/t these two. Either will be fine but the experience will be vastly different.</p>