<p>cruz… it wasn’t you who offended me. it was some dude named ben who posted in this thread a long time ago… you could never offend me… who could be offended by beeboy’s sweet, innocent face?</p>
<p>i just wanted to make sure you knew that i wasn’t actually an objectivist, but was merely defending objectivism (if that makes sense). </p>
<p>and to answer your question, no… it’s not sad (well, maybe the part where you realize how long you have really known the aforementioned figure is).</p>
<p>I do have a nice cute face. thanks.</p>
<p>It does. Just like I occasionally defend extreme socialism just to proof their merit as real ideas.</p>
<p>i think the two individuals mentioned above would kill you for discussing their real names online… we have to come up with code names so our identities don’t get stolen. </p>
<p>ohh… and i said “sweet, innocent” and not “nice cute”. there’s a big difference between the two.. although i’m not necessarily denying the later… ;)</p>
<p>ha, nalydylan, I’m just like you when treating beliefs.
I believe people can have their own beliefs and there is nothing wrong about philosophies. People upbring in different situations and develop different prospective.
objectivist are not hurting anyone, people should leave them alone instead trying to change them, and making everyone think the same way.</p>
<p>everything we do is selfish. why do YOU do community service? most likely so YOU would get into college, or feel good about YOURSELF, or so YOU can appease someone. you wouldn’t do something that you absolutely don’t care about, even if it is community service.</p>
<p>@ nalydylan: well, what’s like juice, but a little different? Milk?</p>
<p>That’s a interesting point mgccl. i agree to a degree.</p>
<p>@nalydylan:</p>
<p>
lol
In the words of the Von Mill, “But ughh?” :)</p>