<p>Admiral Thomas:</p>
<p>Yes, Admiral Thomas, there is a screener for negative and cynical people, because such a thing is possible. It's difficult to detect cynicism about the naval academy in someone who hasn't been there yet nor been able to develop a negative attitude. If you're negative to begin with, why would you apply in the first place?</p>
<p>Of course I had high aspirations for coming here. You should read my admission essays: "want to become a better person...blah, blah, blah" But you get into the ac year and it just goes downhill. A lot of people see Plebes as some kind of justification to power trip and let their egos cloud any leadership ability they might be seeking to develop. Nobody respects you if you're an ass, and unfortunately that's what a lot of people are. And sure, you have to deal with it, but you also wonder how they become like that? </p>
<p>A lot of people lack any impartiality or judgement. It's a favorites game. Some people develop great friendships with the upperclass and some don't. And if you're not their friend, and they don't know you, you'll get ranked poorly. And really that's where the system breaks down. How do you simultaneously develop and maintain this sense of professionalism while some people are willing to become friends with you, go out drinking with you, whatever? The two are almost always mutually exclusive. The entire environment of bancroft hall is not really conducive to maintaining this rift between upperclass and plebes, because first of all, these leadership positions are just as much for upperclass as they are for plebes, so both sides of the coin have people who often have very little idea what the hell they're doing. I don't know how to follow. Well that's alright, I don't know how to lead. And so the situation deteriorates into some lowest common denominator where we develop close friendships as some sort of adjunct to real leadership. So you have some people that will distance themselves, some that'll be your friends, they're spread through the entire chain-of-command, and the entire system is a model of how a lack of uniformity screws things up.</p>
<p>Secondly, it's a dorm. People have their own lives. There's no mission to the naval academy. Yeah, yeah, develop midshipman morally, mentally, physically, blah, blah, blah, but some people work towards that purpose, some do not, and others pick and choose. We're really not united in any uniformity of purpose. Mids at the naval academy have their own objectives, each class's roles are rather ill-defined and vague, because yeah training sergeants are supposed to keep you in line, but they're not always training, different people have different styles and they might be training you with different objectives in mind.</p>
<p>So you have thousands of people working towards different objectives, with different personalities, some who care, some who don't, some who will scream at you for stupid things, others who'll hang out in your room, all interspersed through the entire brigade, throughout the companies and up and down your chain of command, and you're expected to keep up with this weird dynamicism that fluctuates just trying to get down the hall. Someone'll tell you to stop yelling, five seconds later someone yells at you for not being loud enough. What I'm getting at is that this attempt to meld a university with some military training environment is wholly imperfect and very irritating for it's distinct lack of solidarity. The two are at odds with each other.</p>
<p>That's why plebe summer is no big deal. Everyone's working toward the same thing. Everyone's an ass, and you know what to expect. There's a standard--something that is entirely absent from the naval academy as a whole.</p>
<p>usna09mom: I'm a guy. It was a joke.</p>