<p>For those of you who took the SAT and used Princeton Review 11 Tests as prep. please post your scores and comments.</p>
<p>EX.</p>
<p>PR
M: 800
CR: 640
W: 780</p>
<p>SAT
M: 710
CR: 680
W: 760</p>
<p>Comments: Math was too easy on PR, CR was harder, and writing was easier.</p>
<p>^Just an example. It's not real.</p>
<p>well i think that the math is a little trickier, the cr has a **** load of mistakes, and writing is about the same</p>
<p>I took 5 practice tests the nights before the May 3 SAT with the PR's 11 Practice tests for the SAT.</p>
<p>I was scoring in the range from 1900s - 2100s.</p>
<p>The math on the PR was really easy, but the reading and writing would kill me. The practice tests I took reflected my score accurately tbh. Math would be 760-800 and CR+Writing would be around 600-660.</p>
<p>On the real SAT, I got a 730 math, 670 writing, 620 CR (GOD I HATE CR) = 2020 total
Princeton review is helpful :]</p>
<p>I don't remember my breakdown of my practice test scores, but PR is very accurate from what I remember.</p>
<p>Pr
Cr 750
M 770
W 740</p>
<p>Sat
Cr 710
M 800
W 780</p>
<p>Math in 11 PR is more difficult than math in official SAT. Writing is about the same. PR Cr is difficult than the real SAT</p>
<p>I'm hoping the CR is indeed more difficult than the real SAT. That way I can do better...</p>