<p>I just finished the book today and I feel so underprepared. I went through the book fine and </p>
<p>understood all the concepts and stuff but it seems like pr is... lacking? For those of you who </p>
<p>used princeton review only how did it go? are there any other chem books that will better </p>
<p>prepare me? So far I borrowed barrons, arco, kaplan, and rea and I have only one day left so </p>
<p>which book should I choose to review tomorrow?</p>
<p>i used PR and i get about 60-65+ on the MC and a very good score on the free response. I think PR is fine.</p>
<p>PR is fine, just know it. Barron’s is better IMO, but I don’t think trying to cram Barron’s in one day would be effective or useful–you’d be better off reviewing PR and if there’s anything you don’t understand/want to brush up on, you could glance at that specific topic in Barron’s.</p>
<p>I used PR and got a 5 last year</p>
<p>This is probably a dumb question but what does ‘IMO’ mean?</p>
<p>in my opinion</p>
<p>ohhhhhhhhhhhhh. lol</p>
<p>I think PR is usually solid.</p>
<p>Yeah, PR’s solid. I’ve been using it and just got around a 152/160 on the 2008 Released Exam. I also have Barron’s but have yet to look at it.</p>