<p>Are these books accurate? I mean, are the tests they give of the same format as the tests? And is their level higher or lower than the actual exam?
Specifically P,C Maths 2C
Thanks</p>
<p>Princeton Review tends to be on the easy side. Their practice tests are ok. For IIC, I thought the most accurate practice tests were from SparkNotes.</p>
<p>I like PR for Physics and Chem. Most of my Chem knowledge was from AP Chem review, but it was a good refresher after a month (if this applies to you). But I reviewed for Physics with PR as well and, without having taken any AP Physics class, learned enough to get a good score.</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>Yea I think it's a good "refresher" but don't count on it to learn anything new. I supplemented my Kaplan Bio SAT II book with PR and it was helpful, but alone I don't think it would have been enough.</p>
<p>Used Sparknotes for Math IIC and PR for Physics, 800 on both</p>
<p>I have definetly noticed that Princeton Review is significantly easier than the other books. I believe Barron's is the hardest.</p>
<p>actually i've just given exams in school for electricity electrostats, nuclear, etc and the rest (apart from optics and matrices) i did last year. so i basically need a refresher sort of thing. so PR is good enough for that?</p>
<p>Yes .</p>