<p>Well I just took a math section in the ACT red book. In PR I finished with barely any time left on math, while on the real thing (red book) I finished with 10 left. </p>
<p>Similar scores on both, though. Knew all the q's but made 2-3 silly errors on each lol. (But 4 silly errors on the real thing.... <em>frustrating as heck</em>) </p>
<p>How would you guys compare PR vs. ACT when it comes to time and difficulty?</p>
<p>I think they are both quite similar. And if there is a difference then PR is only slightly harder. My average on PR math section is about 30 while in the Real ACT I got up to 35.</p>
<p>On PR Math, I got a 33. Real, 30.
PR English, 35. Real, 33.
PR Reading, 24. Real, 30.</p>
<p>I guess it depends which test.</p>
<p>I guess you are right. I should have also mentioned that I took the PR tests when I only started studying for the test and the Real much towards the end.</p>
<p>Oh sorry, I thought you guys meant the real test as in the “actual” ACT test. When I said “Real” a few posts back, I meant my actual scores from the June 12th ACT test, not from the red book. Sorry.</p>