predict your SAT scores!

<p>scores come out next wednesday.
i started a thread where we were going to predict our scores</p>

<p>now that we've taken the test:</p>

<p>Verbal: 650 + (i've seen a couple that I've missed, at most I'll have a 700)
Math: 720 ish (i missed four, not sure what that's going to count as)</p>

<p>math: ~750
verbal: ~750</p>

<p>i really hope i'm right! :) (wishful thinking...)</p>

<p>Math IIC: 690 :-&lt;/p>

<p>math: 780 - 800
verbal: 700 - 750</p>

<p>im screwd...........big time, i took the december 5th (sunday) but it was the march 2004 sat they gave over again i omitted 30 question on verbal!!!!!!!!! 18 on math!!!!!</p>

<p>whoa!!! why? </p>

<p>hopefully the 18 on math were from the experimental section our experimental one was hard!!!</p>

<p>it wasnt 18 from one section it was all over the place, i was hoping for a 1200-1250, but i guess ill take it for the last time in january</p>

<p>math: 780-800
verbal: 750-800</p>

<p>total: 1530-1600</p>

<p>would it be useless to retake the sat in january if im a sophomore? or should just prepare really hard for the new ones junior year?</p>

<p>aseemo, if ur a soph, i don't think any colleges will be accepting the old SAT. maybe a few, i dunno, i could be wrong, must the majority of them will be only accepting the new SAT.</p>

<p>Unless I started botching the answer placement in section 3 Quantcomps, 780-800 Math, otherwise, 650ish Math O.O <em>barf</em></p>

<p>For verbal I think I did a ton better... anywhere from 700-800.</p>

<p>So, anywhere from 1350 to 1600 XD hahaha</p>

<p>It's really up in the air... I have no idea.</p>

<p>Verbal: -1 CR that I know of so probably about 790-800
Math: -5 Raw so probably about 720-730</p>

<p>I am really irritated with myself because I made some very stupid mistakes in math.</p>

<p>What is the difference between experimental and such? Do they give extra points/curve if you answer it correctly?</p>

<p>No, they they don't take the experimental section into your scores account at all. However, I think that they do use it in setting the curve for the upcoming test or something like that.</p>

<p>haha i wish...</p>

<p>don't predict, it always come out lower than you think!</p>

<p>780 physics, 600 writing YES I SUCK AT WRITING!</p>

<p>I honestly wouldn't be surprised if I got like a 590 math and a 560 verbal this time.</p>

<p>thedude or anyone else on this board. Since you believe you did so well in the verbal section, can you please help me out? I would really appreciate it. For the interview passage: was it that the author used historical sources; was it a false sense of comprhension(I dont remember the question), and also was one of the answers about footnotes and citation to the text where it was originated.
Artificial Intelligence:How did the author responded: Did Passage 2 showed CAUTION interest. I forgot the first one.
Africa passage about the woman: I put something that art was conceived on a large scale. Probably wrong. Was it pain and suffering in art?
(myth) question: was it that something about not easily distinguishable?
Did she had a genius to lead the community or she nearly achieveed mythical status from her neighbors in Kenya.
PLEASE!!!I would like to know what you ppl put. Thanks a lot.</p>

<p>dreamkissed..that'll be pretty good anyway!...thats wat?...1150...decent</p>