<p>I was there over the summer and he gave a very good speech about making sure the university changes to the new global environment and our technological challenges, so as to ensure its academic supremacy. But, by losing him, isn't Harvard effectively saying that they are too interested in really asking the tough questions that Summers posed? And, consequently, isn't Harvard maybe giving way to some people's criticisms that, in fact, its a school which has more brand name than is actually deserved?</p>