<p><for all="" the="" controversy,="" brusqueness,="" je="" ne="" sais="" quoi="" that="" made="" summers="" offensive,="" for="" faults="" brought="" with="" him="" to="" mass.="" hall,="" also="" a="" vision.="" more="" than="" that,="" he="" ability="" articulate="" vision="" and="" willingness="" struggle="" passionately="" it.=""> {Byerley's Crimson editorial reference}</for></p>
<pre><code> Would that Summers were as effective in implementing his vision and bringing others along, as the Crimson editorial's summary of it. [However, the editorial writers should fact-check the date of the women-in-science speech: last winter (January) not "last spring." Also, grammar-check in WORD will catch their errors in using "which" instead of "that." And "je ne sais quoi" - ouch for such pretentious cliche.]
</code></pre>
<p>Also check out: <a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=511477%5B/url%5D">http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=511477</a></p>
<p><summers knew="" the="" rules.="" he="" dangers="" of="" saying,="" i="" know="" best,="" to="" a="" collection="" greatest="" minds="" in="" world.="" and="" yet="" still="" dug="" his="" own="" grave.="" .=""> THE ECONOMIST, Alex Slack 06</summers></p>