<p>Okay, I can see your point. It’s interesting, and perhaps they should change it (the lower level scholarship has required scores below the US average). Still, I think it is helpful. But again, I did say to focus on the poor. Bright Futures is ultimately beneficial to the state, so keeping it in some form while increasing aid to the poor would be ideal.</p>
<p>
More like the means are being shrunk. Funding is constantly being cut by a conservative state government (even though a Republican started the program).</p>
<p>
Technically, it goes directly to paying tuition. But I see what you’re saying, it means money can be withdrawn from FLPP at a reduction and used on other things.</p>