<p>
[quote]
Yes, it is unfair. However, your analogy is even more unfair. It's more like comparing the whole UC system to MIT and Harvard (schools that have relatively strong ties), as opposed to the entire Ivy League, which has minimal ties.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Huh? Ties to what? </p>
<p>
[quote]
"more outlets for students?" What does that mean? UCLA and Berkeley both have about 700 club type orginizations one can join, for starters.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Well, I don't want to put words in twylabloo's mouth. But I gather that this is a reference to a problem of a lack of resources per capita. Berkeley has a lot of resources, but also has a lot of students trying to access those resources, such that what is available to an individual student may not be as much as what is available to an individual student elsewhere. For example, the Berkeley library system is huge, but if the books that you want have been checked out by somebody else, then that hugeness doesn't help you very much. </p>
<p>
[quote]
Correct me if i'm wrong for all you seasoned UC'ers (i'm an incoming Bruin) but yes, there can be some hundred students in one lecture hall, but you're required to take a discussion section which I believe is capped off at 25 students, maybe less. I think you'd still get a sense of a smaller class size
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Yeah, but it's only a sense of a smaller class size. Let's face it. You're coming to UC to learn from professors, not from a bunch of graduate-student TA's. That's not what you're paying for. That's not why you're there. People aren't competing for admissions spots to UC because they are champing at the bit to be taught by a bunch of graduate students. Am I wrong? </p>
<p>
[quote]
I think in ANY post-secondary education, whether it'd be a private or public institution, any student will discover some type of outlet that will fit their wants and needs. It doesn't matter how much more outlets a school has, it's all up to the student to reach out and find those outlets for his/herself
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Yes, of course it is true that the student bears some responsibility for taking advantage of opportunities. On the other hand, let's not kid ourselves. The kinds of available opportunities and outlets are also important. It's a partnership between the school and the student, and both sides are responsible for making it work. You can't lay all the blame on one or the other. So you can't really say that the number of outlets doesn't matter. It does matter. Nobody ever complains about a school having too many outlets. </p>
<p>
[quote]
I can see why people would view the fact that UC students are just a "number," but personally, I THRIVE in a situation like that. I think it gives me a sense of the real world, where there's no hand holding, where I'm in charge of my own self, where I go out there and search for my own niche and direction in life. I'm a number, a Bruin, and damn proud of it.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I'm very happy that you're enjoying your experience at UC. Yet the fact is, a lot of people don't enjoy their experience at UC. They don't thrive in the UC environment.</p>
<p>Look, none of this is to say that I think UC is a bad school system. Indeed, I think the UC school system is pretty good, especially its graduate-school programs which I view as being some of the best in the world. However, I think what we can all agree on is that UC is not for everyone, and in particular, other schools are better at certain things. Some people will do well at UC, but other people will do better at other schools.</p>