<p>Is there a huge difference? i have the princeton review 2008 so is it necessary to go get the 2009 book?</p>
<p>I'm trying to improve from a 31.5 - 35 or 36.</p>
<p>Well I used my brother’s 2006 edition of Cracking the ACT and it seemed pretty consistent to what is really on the test. I don’t think the years make a big difference.</p>
<p>I pretty sure they are the same practice tests in the end, for one thing.</p>
<p>YES</p>
<p>Princeton Review is a book that changes frequently according to recent ACTs, so you should get it not only for that but for more practice tests.</p>
<p>really egbert??
I was under the impression that the tests between the editions are pretty much the same. The only difference is that they edited the book with additional tips/errors that don’t really help lol…just thought it was a marketing scheme</p>
<p>whatever, I haven’t opened one of those in awhile so I’m probably wrong</p>
<p>no really it does make a difference.</p>
<p>It’s not terrible, but it is worth getting the new one.</p>