<p>I have been using the practice tests in the Princeton Review 11 Practice SATs book to prepare for the SATs. Has anyone else used this book before and if so, are your practice test scores from this book to use for predicting your actual test scores?
If not, what is a better practice test book?</p>
<p>bump. anyone?</p>
<p>Yes. Princeton Review is a good predicter of your score</p>
<p>wow for me princeton is a lot harder
i do 100 points better on cb tests</p>
<p>yea thats what i've been finding too</p>
<p>yea, i agree.</p>
<p>The PR is definitely harder- especially the vocab words.</p>
<p>I've been using it and the tests are really good. A little harder is ok, so that the real thing feels easier. I hope so, anyway!</p>
<p>The CR is harder and inaccurate. I averaged low 600s on my CR on the PR tests and got 720 on the real thing first time.</p>
<p>I used it to study for this october's sat. On the practice test I would get average 590 CR and 570 Math. The best I got was 640 CR and 640 Math on the practice. On the actual test I received a 720 CR and 610 Math.</p>
<p>I would reccomend using the blue book if u want practice. why not use real questions from the test maker?</p>